山东大学学报:哲学社会科学版
山東大學學報:哲學社會科學版
산동대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
2012年
6期
9~15
,共null页
器官移植立法 活体器官捐献者 权利保护
器官移植立法 活體器官捐獻者 權利保護
기관이식입법 활체기관연헌자 권리보호
organ transplantation legislation; living donor; protection of rights
为保护活体器官捐献者,建议立法在坚持“死体器官捐献优先”的同时,采用“合理等待时间”意义上的“必要原则”;采用“可能导致捐献者不得不依靠医疗帮助继续生存的捐献都应被禁止”意义上的“合理性原则”,并对合理性“独立评估”;因器官捐献属于非治疗性医疗介入,根据Gieson的规则,应“高标准告知”;同时,即使捐献者不愿意知悉手术相关信息,也需要“强迫告知”,并坚持“告知结果独立评估”;为了保障自愿并规避潜在利益冲突和心理操控,建议立法规定如下程序性规则:“医学检验后行原则”、设置“反悔期”及“回避原则”等,并有义务为捐献者“随时无条件的体面退出”提供理由,即使理由是虚假的;同时,对器官摘除手术采用“同行业内监督原则”。
為保護活體器官捐獻者,建議立法在堅持“死體器官捐獻優先”的同時,採用“閤理等待時間”意義上的“必要原則”;採用“可能導緻捐獻者不得不依靠醫療幫助繼續生存的捐獻都應被禁止”意義上的“閤理性原則”,併對閤理性“獨立評估”;因器官捐獻屬于非治療性醫療介入,根據Gieson的規則,應“高標準告知”;同時,即使捐獻者不願意知悉手術相關信息,也需要“彊迫告知”,併堅持“告知結果獨立評估”;為瞭保障自願併規避潛在利益遲突和心理操控,建議立法規定如下程序性規則:“醫學檢驗後行原則”、設置“反悔期”及“迴避原則”等,併有義務為捐獻者“隨時無條件的體麵退齣”提供理由,即使理由是虛假的;同時,對器官摘除手術採用“同行業內鑑督原則”。
위보호활체기관연헌자,건의입법재견지“사체기관연헌우선”적동시,채용“합리등대시간”의의상적“필요원칙”;채용“가능도치연헌자불득불의고의료방조계속생존적연헌도응피금지”의의상적“합이성원칙”,병대합이성“독립평고”;인기관연헌속우비치료성의료개입,근거Gieson적규칙,응“고표준고지”;동시,즉사연헌자불원의지실수술상관신식,야수요“강박고지”,병견지“고지결과독립평고”;위료보장자원병규피잠재이익충돌화심리조공,건의입법규정여하정서성규칙:“의학검험후행원칙”、설치“반회기”급“회피원칙”등,병유의무위연헌자“수시무조건적체면퇴출”제공이유,즉사이유시허가적;동시,대기관적제수술채용“동행업내감독원칙”。
To protect living donors, organ transplantation legislation should adhere to the "cadaverie organ priority rule" as well as the "necessary principle" which means reasonable waiting time. Organ transplantation legislation should also uphold the "principle of rationality", that is, medical interventions which result in donors having to rely on medical help should be prohibited. Independent assessment should be undertaken to ensure the rationality of any donation. According to the Gieson rule, higher standards of disclosure should apply to living donors. Moreo- ver, mandatory disclosure should apply in case donors do not want procedure-related information. Independent as- sessment is also necessary in such cases. Organ transplantation legislation should also stick to some procedural rules, including the "principle of postponed medical examinations" , "withdrawal period" and "avoidance princi- pal", providing excuse for donors to withdraw decently at any time. In addition, organ transplantation laws should prescribe that organ removal surgery should be supervised by peers.