山东大学学报:哲学社会科学版
山東大學學報:哲學社會科學版
산동대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
2012年
6期
29~34
,共null页
发展权 约文解释法 目的解释法 特殊差别待遇
髮展權 約文解釋法 目的解釋法 特殊差彆待遇
발전권 약문해석법 목적해석법 특수차별대우
fight of development; textual approach; teleological approach; special and differential treatment
WTO专家组和上诉机构在协议解释实践中,经常违反相关国际公法解释习惯规则,过分机械适用约文解释法,拘泥于所用词语的通常意义,漠视WTO协议的发展及其他目的和宗旨,导致其协议解释缺乏正"-3性,不能有效维护广大发展中国家成员的合法权益。WTO协议存在诸多含义模糊之处及其突出的动态性和原则向性,自然需要目的解释法来澄清含义及填补法律漏洞。WTO协议的目的决定了WTO多边法律制度的本质和主要价值取向,任何违背WTO协议目的的解释都是不允许的。专家组和上诉机构应该将约文解释法、目的解释法及其他解释法平等协调起来,同时,要将WTO协议的目的作为衡量其解释的正当性的重要标准,在不违反WTO明文规定的前提下,充分发挥目的解释法的澄清模糊条款及填补漏洞的特有职能。注重目的解释法的重要性,有利于保证WTO协议的发展目的得以实现,有助于维护广大发展中国家的合法权益。
WTO專傢組和上訴機構在協議解釋實踐中,經常違反相關國際公法解釋習慣規則,過分機械適用約文解釋法,拘泥于所用詞語的通常意義,漠視WTO協議的髮展及其他目的和宗旨,導緻其協議解釋缺乏正"-3性,不能有效維護廣大髮展中國傢成員的閤法權益。WTO協議存在諸多含義模糊之處及其突齣的動態性和原則嚮性,自然需要目的解釋法來澄清含義及填補法律漏洞。WTO協議的目的決定瞭WTO多邊法律製度的本質和主要價值取嚮,任何違揹WTO協議目的的解釋都是不允許的。專傢組和上訴機構應該將約文解釋法、目的解釋法及其他解釋法平等協調起來,同時,要將WTO協議的目的作為衡量其解釋的正噹性的重要標準,在不違反WTO明文規定的前提下,充分髮揮目的解釋法的澄清模糊條款及填補漏洞的特有職能。註重目的解釋法的重要性,有利于保證WTO協議的髮展目的得以實現,有助于維護廣大髮展中國傢的閤法權益。
WTO전가조화상소궤구재협의해석실천중,경상위반상관국제공법해석습관규칙,과분궤계괄용약문해석법,구니우소용사어적통상의의,막시WTO협의적발전급기타목적화종지,도치기협의해석결핍정"-3성,불능유효유호엄대발전중국가성원적합법권익。WTO협의존재제다함의모호지처급기돌출적동태성화원칙향성,자연수요목적해석법래징청함의급전보법률루동。WTO협의적목적결정료WTO다변법률제도적본질화주요개치취향,임하위배WTO협의목적적해석도시불윤허적。전가조화상소궤구응해장약문해석법、목적해석법급기타해석법평등협조기래,동시,요장WTO협의적목적작위형량기해석적정당성적중요표준,재불위반WTO명문규정적전제하,충분발휘목적해석법적징청모호조관급전보루동적특유직능。주중목적해석법적중요성,유리우보증WTO협의적발전목적득이실현,유조우유호엄대발전중국가적합법권익。
The WTO Panel and Appellate Body, in their treaty interpretation practices, oiten act against related customary rules for interpreting public international laws, tend to apply the treaty too mechanically, stick to the ordinary meaning of words, and overlook development of the treaty and alternative objects and purposes of the WTO agreements. Such practices result in a lack of legitimacy in their treaty interpretation as well as failure to protect the legal interests of developing countries. The fact that WTO agreements feature too many ambiguous rules and striking dynamics and the principle-orientation naturally necessitates the teleological approach to clarify ambiguity and fill the legal loopholes. The objectives and purposes of WTO agreement determine the nature and main values of the WTO' s multilateral legal system, thus any interpretation against these objectives and purposes should he prohibi- ted. The panel and the Appellate Body should harmonize the textual approach, the teleological approach and other approaches in an equal manner. Specifically, they should treat the teleological approach as the essential criteria for the legitimacy of their interpretation and fully make use of its unique functions of clearance and loophole-fillings on the premise of conformity with the expressed rules. An emphasis on the importance of teleological approach could help promote the development the WTO agreements and protect the legal interests of the developing countries.