CAJ | 학술논문

法律修辞学的核心在于其“听众理论”。“司法强拆”作为一种从司法到立法的全方位的法律修辞，其听众有以下三类：（1）普遍听众，即为社会大众。（2）单一听众，即具体案件当中的当事人。（3）说理者本身，即国家行政机关。而作为法律修辞的“司法强拆”的立法旨趣仅仅在于通过对三种听众进行分化，争取大多数的与具体案情没有直接关系的社会大众，在现有框架下尽量保证部分听众之间的局部矛盾不会轻而易举的膨胀并发酵为其他矛盾。这种修辞存在概念的不稳定性、价值初衷的功利性、实践的颠覆性等三方面实务操作困境，但即便如此，“司法强拆”依然存在增量意义。
법률수사학적핵심재우기“은음이론”。“사법강탁”작위일충종사법도입법적전방위적법률수사，기은음유이하삼류：（1）보편은음，즉위사회대음。（2）단일은음，즉구체안건당중적당사인。（3）설리자본신，즉국가행정궤관。이작위법률수사적“사법강탁”적입법지취부부재우통과대삼충은음진행분화，쟁취대다수적여구체안정몰유직접관계적사회대음，재현유광가하진량보증부분은음지간적국부모순불회경이역거적팽창병발효위기타모순。저충수사존재개념적불은정성、개치초충적공리성、실천적전복성등삼방면실무조작곤경，단즉편여차，“사법강탁”의연존재증량의의。
Forensic rhetorics centers on the Rationale of Adherence of Audience. The Judicial Enforcement, as a genre of forensic rhetorics, has three kinds of audience, namely ： a. universal audience, which is the public ; b. particular audience, which are those involved in the affairs; c. orator himself, which is the enforcing agency. The tragedy of the enforcement as rhetoric is to separate the three kinds of audiences by dragging the public to their side and freezeing the contradiction with the particular audience. However unstable, cynical and uncertain, it a- mount to a settlement of the present problems.