CAJ | 학술논문

本文通过调查TEM4语法词汇项目的潜在结构和影响构念的因素来评价该项目的构念效度。采用专家判断法收集内容效度的证据，Rasch模型分析题目作答反应对构念效度的影响，并借助验证性因子分析了解项目的构念构成。研究结果显示，内容考点判断非常一致；绝大部份题目拟合模型，项目有较好的单维性特征，题目作答基本上相互独立，不过，项目相对于考生的能力来说比较难，从而导致少数难度较大的题目不拟合模型，对项目的构念贡献不足；语法和词汇属于两个非常相关但是又相互独立的构念。
본문통과조사TEM4어법사회항목적잠재결구화영향구념적인소래평개해항목적구념효도。채용전가판단법수집내용효도적증거，Rasch모형분석제목작답반응대구념효도적영향，병차조험증성인자분석료해항목적구념구성。연구결과현시，내용고점판단비상일치；절대부빈제목의합모형，항목유교호적단유성특정，제목작답기본상상호독립，불과，항목상대우고생적능력래설비교난，종이도치소수난도교대적제목불의합모형，대항목적구념공헌불족；어법화사회속우량개비상상관단시우상호독립적구념。
The study evaluates the construct validity of the Grammar and Vocabulary Section of TEM4 by investigating the underpinning structure of the test, possible construct under-representation and construct-irrelevant threats. To this end, content-related evidence was gathered by expert judgment; construct representation and relevance were explored by Rasch anal- ysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The findings revealed that independent judgments yield consistent results on content-related evidence;construct-irrelevance is absent thanks to the adherence of data to unidimensionality, reasonably local independence, and good measurement properties of most items, but the subtest is relatively difficulty for the sample, which might attribute to some erratic item responses and construct under-representation; grammar knowledge and vocabulary knowledge are two highly correlated traits and few item responses are likely to be depend- ent due to some correlated error terms.