CAJ | 학술논문

已有的意图理解神经成像研究大多关注理解单一个体私人意图的脑功能定位，而较少涉及两个或更多人的社会性交际意图，大脑区分私人意图和交际意图的动态时间过程尚不清楚。本研究记录了16名健康被试理解三种不同意图任务时的脑电成分。三种意图分别为：1）私人意图；2）交际意图；3）物理意图。电生理学结果表明在大脑顶区，私人意图的N250的峰值显著大于交际意图和物理意图。在晚期阶段（300～600ms），交际意图的晚期正成分（LPC）的平均波幅要显著大于私人意图和物理意图。在400～600ms时，私人意图的LPC的平均波幅要显著大于物理意图。本研究为理解私人意图和交际意图的动态加工过程提供了神经电生理学的初步证据。
이유적의도리해신경성상연구대다관주리해단일개체사인의도적뇌공능정위，이교소섭급량개혹경다인적사회성교제의도，대뇌구분사인의도화교제의도적동태시간과정상불청초。본연구기록료16명건강피시리해삼충불동의도임무시적뇌전성분。삼충의도분별위：1）사인의도；2）교제의도；3）물리의도。전생이학결과표명재대뇌정구，사인의도적N250적봉치현저대우교제의도화물리의도。재만기계단（300～600ms），교제의도적만기정성분（LPC）적평균파폭요현저대우사인의도화물리의도。재400～600ms시，사인의도적LPC적평균파폭요현저대우물리의도。본연구위리해사인의도화교제의도적동태가공과정제공료신경전생이학적초보증거。
Theory of mind （TOM） refers to understanding other＇s mental states, such as beliefs, intentions, emotions, and thoughts, to predict other＇s behaviors. ToM gradually became one of the areas of much interest among developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. The concept of attribution of intentions to others is a central element of ToM. In the daily life, we not only need to understand the private intention of a single person, but also have to understand the communicative intention among two or multiple persons. Understanding the communicative intention is more complex than understanding the private intention. In the current study, the event related potentials （ERPs） technology was employed to explore the dissociative electrophysiological correlates for understanding private versus communicative intention while the subjects observing three types of comic strips： 1） private intention; 2） communicative intention; 3） physical intention. We report the ERP study to investigate the time course of understanding the private intention and understanding the communicative intention. Electrophysiological results showed a significantly larger amplitude peak of N250 over the parietal sites for private intention compared to communicative and physical intentions in the 200-300 ms epoch. At a later stage （i.e., from 300-600 ms）, the mean amplitudes of the late positive component （LPC） for communicative intention were more positive than those for the private and physical intentions. Furthermore, the mean amplitudes of the LPC were also significantly larger for private intention compared to the physical intention from 400-600 ms. Our data provide a direct comparison between the electrophysiological correlates for understanding the private intention as well as understanding the communicative intention. Our findings show that understanding the communicative intention overlaps the neural system capable of understanding private intention but requires the involvement of an additional system. Individuals are first able to understand a single person＇s intention, and understanding the communicative intention builds on that earlier understanding by involving the same mental-state processing characteristic of understanding private intention plus an additional communicative intention processing system as well. We believe that understanding private intention and understanding the communicative intention are two different levels of ToM. Understanding the private intention is the basis for understanding the communicative intention and the level of understanding the communicative intention is higher than the level of understanding the private intention.