CAJ | 학술논문

个体通常利用社会比较进行自我评价，而比较对象的选择及其对个体自我的影响是一个内隐的过程，研究基于选择通达理论，通过三个实验考察了个体自发比较时威胁效应的来源及其消解，结果表明：（1）威胁效应来源于自主条件下比较对象的选择。个体在比较后的自我评价过程中激活了周围优秀人物的信息，比较后自我评价水平降低，引发社会比较的威胁；（2）中国文化背景下的个体在比较后存在威胁“泛化”现象，不论操作任务是否与自我相关，均会出现社会比较的威胁效应；（3）与周围优秀人物进行比较所导致的威胁效应，可以通过自我肯定策略得以缓解，使个体的整体自我系统重新恢复平衡。
개체통상이용사회비교진행자아평개，이비교대상적선택급기대개체자아적영향시일개내은적과정，연구기우선택통체이론，통과삼개실험고찰료개체자발비교시위협효응적래원급기소해，결과표명：（1）위협효응래원우자주조건하비교대상적선택。개체재비교후적자아평개과정중격활료주위우수인물적신식，비교후자아평개수평강저，인발사회비교적위협；（2）중국문화배경하적개체재비교후존재위협“범화”현상，불론조작임무시부여자아상관，균회출현사회비교적위협효응；（3）여주위우수인물진행비교소도치적위협효응，가이통과자아긍정책략득이완해，사개체적정체자아계통중신회복평형。
People often encounter comparative information, actively or passively, to judge one＇s self-worth. The Selective Accessible Theory （SAT）（Mussweiler, 2003） proposed that the similarity and dissimilarity test are the core mechanisms to determine the consequences of comparison on the basis of informational foci. This suggests that the information activated by the social context can actually determine the self-evaluation outcomes, displacing toward or away from the comparison target. However, little has done to explore the individual spontaneous choice toward different comparison target based on SAT and its influence on the self, especially in Chinese cultural context. Chinese people prefer upward comparison, i.e., comparing with more capable target to find their competency gap. Downward comparison would be used only if they cannot find effective ways to eliminate the negative feelings accompanied with upward comparison. Such dissimilarity hypothesis has been found to result in lower self-evaluation, according to SAT. Thus, the self-threat of comparison appears. The present study explores the source of such threat of comparison and its balance through 3 experiments. In experiment 1, participants were required to write down the names of three potential comparison targets. Control group is also used as a basic level to examine the effect after comparison. As expected, the information of routine upward comparison target was activated and the threat of comparison to self has emerged. Experiment 2 extends this finding by introducing the task relevance （high/low） to explore its influencing factor. Performance feedback （contrastive/non-contrastive） was provided to simulate an implicit upward comparison target, which would increase the information intensity of upward comparison target. Results suggest that the interaction between task relevance and performance feedback significantly influenced self-evaluation. Specifically, regardless of the level of task relevance, the contrastive and the non-contrastive performance feedback both led to lowered self-evaluation, suggesting the generalized trend of the threat of comparison among Chinese people. However, the generalization of self-threat of comparison doesn＇t emerge in the emotional variable. Experiment 3 further explores the balancing strategy used by Chinese people to alleviate the threat of comparison. Results show that if people have the opportunity to affirm themselves, the threat Of comparison would be attenuated, and knowledge foundation of the threat from upward comparison target would be inaccessible, yet the negative emotion was still there and exhibited a trend of generalization. Based on the results of these experiments, selective accessibility of dissimilar informationexerts significant influence on the social comparison effect, and the Chinese people indeed show something different in this process. The implication and suggestions for future researches are discussed.