辽宁师范大学学报:社会科学版
遼寧師範大學學報:社會科學版
료녕사범대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)
2012年
6期
740~743
,共null页
墨子 礼 反思 儒家 比较
墨子 禮 反思 儒傢 比較
묵자 례 반사 유가 비교
Mozi; Li;introspection;Confucianism; comparison
礼在中华民族传统文化中占有重要地位。墨子熟悉儒家的礼乐传统典籍,对礼的态度与儒家有联系,更有明显区别。其联系在于他并不反对有益于治理社会的礼,其区别在于他主张节礼。他在反思西周礼乐传统的基础上,提出了包括"非乐""节葬"等主张在内的节礼思想。在社会剧烈变动的春秋时期,儒墨两家同样出于现实关怀而反思礼,却得出了不同的结论。儒家力主"克己复礼",回复西周礼乐之大统;墨家则反对一切繁文缛节,主张"背周从夏",走上了"节礼"的道路。
禮在中華民族傳統文化中佔有重要地位。墨子熟悉儒傢的禮樂傳統典籍,對禮的態度與儒傢有聯繫,更有明顯區彆。其聯繫在于他併不反對有益于治理社會的禮,其區彆在于他主張節禮。他在反思西週禮樂傳統的基礎上,提齣瞭包括"非樂""節葬"等主張在內的節禮思想。在社會劇烈變動的春鞦時期,儒墨兩傢同樣齣于現實關懷而反思禮,卻得齣瞭不同的結論。儒傢力主"剋己複禮",迴複西週禮樂之大統;墨傢則反對一切繁文縟節,主張"揹週從夏",走上瞭"節禮"的道路。
례재중화민족전통문화중점유중요지위。묵자숙실유가적례악전통전적,대례적태도여유가유련계,경유명현구별。기련계재우타병불반대유익우치리사회적례,기구별재우타주장절례。타재반사서주례악전통적기출상,제출료포괄"비악""절장"등주장재내적절례사상。재사회극렬변동적춘추시기,유묵량가동양출우현실관부이반사례,각득출료불동적결론。유가력주"극기복례",회복서주례악지대통;묵가칙반대일절번문욕절,주장"배주종하",주상료"절례"적도로。
Li (etiquette) played a significant role in traditional Chinese culture. Familiar with Confucian texts, Mozi~s attitude towards Li had both similarities with and differences from Confucian's. Though not objecting to etiquette conducive to the social government, Mozi contended moderation of Li, which con- tained "objection of Yue (music)", and being moderate in funeral ceremony, etc. His theory on modera- tion of Li was based on introspection of Li and Yue tradition in the Western Zhou Dynasty. Despite similar introspection on reality, Confucianism and Mohism went on distinct paths in that period of social upheav- als. While Confucianism tried to regain social order by reemphasizing etiquette set up in the early Western Zhou Dynasty, Mohism opposed all kinds of unnecessary and overelaborate formalities, contending moder- ation of Li, hoping to draw back to thrifty way of life in ancient Xia Dynasty.