CAJ | 학술논문

自乾隆四十五年（1780年）修筑老盐仓一带鱼鳞石塘开始，围绕原有柴塘的处置问题，高宗君臣之间发生了持续的激烈争议。最终结果是，高宗承认了柴塘必须岁修的现实，其修筑石塘即可“一劳永逸”的治水理想不得不作出了让步。柴塘岁修之争绝不仅仅是一种单纯工程技术层面的争论。对于国家掌控下的大型水利工程而言，争论及其结论更具有了一种战略性意义，它预示着清朝政府治水政策和治水行为开始由扩张转向收缩。
자건륭사십오년（1780년）수축로염창일대어린석당개시，위요원유시당적처치문제，고종군신지간발생료지속적격렬쟁의。최종결과시，고종승인료시당필수세수적현실，기수축석당즉가“일로영일”적치수이상불득불작출료양보。시당세수지쟁절불부부시일충단순공정기술층면적쟁론。대우국가장공하적대형수리공정이언，쟁론급기결론경구유료일충전략성의의，타예시착청조정부치수정책화치수행위개시유확장전향수축。
Since the beginning of yulin stone seawall project in laoyancang in the 45th year of the Qianlong reign of the Qing Dynasty （1780）, there was a continually intense dispute between Gaozong and the ministers over the settlement of original Chaitang.The final outcome was that Gaozong acknowledged the reality which Chaitang had to be repaired annually. The ideal of ＂once and for all＂ building yulin stone seawall had to make concessions. The dispute wag＇not only a simple engineering technical argument. For a large-scale water project under the control of the country,the dispute and its conclusion had a strategic contraction of the Qing＇ s water policy and behavior. significance. It heralded the change from expansion to