CAJ | 학술논문

文章基于1989—2009年“中国健康与营养调查（CHNS）”八次入户调查数据，实证检验了政府救助对居民户贫困状况的影响效应。研究结果表明：政府救助资金因挤出了私人救助资源并“诱导”低收入居民更加依赖于政府救助而未能有效发挥减贫作用。平均而言，1个单位政府救助将挤出0．39个单位私人救助资金，并诱导低收入群体降低2．71个单位工作收入；同时对于贫困程度更深的居民户，“挤出效应”和“诱导效应”都更加严重。而社会医疗保险等保障性公共服务能够直接和间接发挥缓解贫困作用。为了帮助低收入者走出贫困，政府由单纯的贫困救助转向为低收入群体更好地提供保障性公共服务将是一种有效的政策选择。
문장기우1989—2009년“중국건강여영양조사（CHNS）”팔차입호조사수거，실증검험료정부구조대거민호빈곤상황적영향효응。연구결과표명：정부구조자금인제출료사인구조자원병“유도”저수입거민경가의뢰우정부구조이미능유효발휘감빈작용。평균이언，1개단위정부구조장제출0．39개단위사인구조자금，병유도저수입군체강저2．71개단위공작수입；동시대우빈곤정도경심적거민호，“제출효응”화“유도효응”도경가엄중。이사회의료보험등보장성공공복무능구직접화간접발휘완해빈곤작용。위료방조저수입자주출빈곤，정부유단순적빈곤구조전향위저수입군체경호지제공보장성공공복무장시일충유효적정책선택。
Based on the data of CHNS from 1989 to 2009,this paper empirically studies the effect of government assistance on household poverty.The results show that： the government assistance funds could not relieve poverty effectively because the private assistance resources are crowded outand the poor are induced to more depend on government assistance. On average,one unit of government assistance will extrude 0. 39 unit of private asistance funds and reduce 2. 71 units of work income of the poor further- more, the crowding-out and inductive effects are more serious threats to thepoorer. And the security public services like social health insurance could effectively alleviate poverty by direct and indirect channels. Therefore, it willbe a more efficient policy choice to provide the poor with the security public services combined with government assistance in order to help to protect thepoor from poverty.