CAJ | 학술논문

《钓鱼岛是中国的固有领土》白皮书揭示的法律事实蕴含着丰富的国际法理，包括中国先占取得钓鱼岛领土主权、“条约必须信守”捍卫着中国的领土主权、割让和时效理由不能支撑日本的主权主张、“非法行为不产生权利”拒绝日本的领土声索等。白皮书揭示的法律事实也清晰地表明：日本的“无主地先占”主张在国际法上不能成立，其“实际控制”没有达到“有效控制”的国际法要求。中国应积极运用《白皮书》揭示的法律事实及其蕴含的国际法理，驳斥日本对钓鱼岛的主权主张与领土声索，让国际社会认清中日钓鱼岛问题争端的真谛，促进争端的外交解决；同时，中国应继续强化对钓鱼岛及其附属海域的实际控制，为日后时机成熟时争端的法律解决进一步充实国际法理依据。
《조어도시중국적고유령토》백피서게시적법률사실온함착봉부적국제법리，포괄중국선점취득조어도령토주권、“조약필수신수”한위착중국적령토주권、할양화시효이유불능지탱일본적주권주장、“비법행위불산생권리”거절일본적령토성색등。백피서게시적법률사실야청석지표명：일본적“무주지선점”주장재국제법상불능성립，기“실제공제”몰유체도“유효공제”적국제법요구。중국응적겁운용《백피서》게시적법률사실급기온함적국제법리，박척일본대조어도적주권주장여령토성색，양국제사회인청중일조어도문제쟁단적진체，촉진쟁단적외교해결；동시，중국응계속강화대조어도급기부속해역적실제공제，위일후시궤성숙시쟁단적법률해결진일보충실국제법리의거。
The White Paper of Diaoyu Dao, an Inherent Territory of China implies a lot of principles of inter- national law, including that China preempted the territorial sovereignty over Diaoyu Dao, the principle that a treaty shall be abided by the contracting parties safeguards China＇s territorial sovereignty over Diaoyu Dao, the cession and prescription can＇ t support Japan＇s sovereignty claim over Diaoyu Dao and the principle that the illegal behavior does not produce a legal right refuses to Japan＇s territorial claim over Diaoyu Dao and etc. The legal facts revealed by the White Paper also clearly show that Japan＇s claim to the territorial sovereignty over Diaoyu Dao through preempting a non-owner land cannot be established and its actual control is not up to the standard of an effective control required in international law. China should actively use the legal facts revealed in the White Paper and the principles of in- ternational law implied in it to refute Japan＇s sovereignty claims over Diaoyu Dao and make the international commu- nity know well the truth of the dispute over Diaoyu Dao between China and Japan. At the same time, China should continue to strengthen the actual control over Diaoyu Dao and its subsidiary waters to enrich the basis of international law for the dispute＇s legal solution at last when the time comes in the future.