台湾研究集刊
檯灣研究集刊
태만연구집간
Taiwan Research Quarterly
2012年
6期
74~83
,共null页
钟理和 陈映真 乡土文学 “台独史观” 民族认同
鐘理和 陳映真 鄉土文學 “檯獨史觀” 民族認同
종리화 진영진 향토문학 “태독사관” 민족인동
Zhong Lihe, Chen Yingzhen, native literature, History of Taiwan Independence, national identity
1960年前后甫入文坛的陈映真喜爱、赞赏钟理和作品，据此扬弃现代主义，初步建立现实主义文学观，并早于叶石涛数年提出“台湾的乡土文学”概念，具有重要义学史意义。1977年陈映真却撰文批评了钟理和小说《夹竹桃》，这一反差缘于时代、社会和文坛语境的变迁。陈映真《原乡的失落》与《“乡土文学”的盲点》堪称姊妹篇，因它们都针对着史明“台独史观”及叶石涛《台湾乡土文学史导论》中“以台湾为中心”等暖昧词语中隐含着的分离主义苗头和倾向。钟理和的缺失是他于新生中国的分娩期所必有的混乱和阵痛中，未能看清整个中国的“正体”和“实相”，从而发生了民族认同上的动摇。这一教训至今仍有重要的现实意义。
1960年前後甫入文罈的陳映真喜愛、讚賞鐘理和作品，據此颺棄現代主義，初步建立現實主義文學觀，併早于葉石濤數年提齣“檯灣的鄉土文學”概唸，具有重要義學史意義。1977年陳映真卻撰文批評瞭鐘理和小說《夾竹桃》，這一反差緣于時代、社會和文罈語境的變遷。陳映真《原鄉的失落》與《“鄉土文學”的盲點》堪稱姊妹篇，因它們都針對著史明“檯獨史觀”及葉石濤《檯灣鄉土文學史導論》中“以檯灣為中心”等暖昧詞語中隱含著的分離主義苗頭和傾嚮。鐘理和的缺失是他于新生中國的分娩期所必有的混亂和陣痛中，未能看清整箇中國的“正體”和“實相”，從而髮生瞭民族認同上的動搖。這一教訓至今仍有重要的現實意義。
1960년전후보입문단적진영진희애、찬상종리화작품，거차양기현대주의，초보건립현실주의문학관，병조우협석도수년제출“태만적향토문학”개념，구유중요의학사의의。1977년진영진각찬문비평료종리화소설《협죽도》，저일반차연우시대、사회화문단어경적변천。진영진《원향적실락》여《“향토문학”적맹점》감칭자매편，인타문도침대착사명“태독사관”급협석도《태만향토문학사도론》중“이태만위중심”등난매사어중은함착적분리주의묘두화경향。종리화적결실시타우신생중국적분면기소필유적혼란화진통중，미능간청정개중국적“정체”화“실상”，종이발생료민족인동상적동요。저일교훈지금잉유중요적현실의의。
When Chen Yingzhen entered the literary world in 1963 he loved and admired Zhong Lihe＇s novels, discarding modernism and preliminarily establishing the concept of realistic literature. What＇s more, he also proposed the concept of ＂Tai- wan native literature＂ several years earlier than Ye Shitao,which proves to be of great importance in literary history. However, it is in 1977 that Chen Yingzhen wrote articles to criticize Zhong Lihe＇s novel ＂Oleander＂. This dramatic turn stems from the changes of time, society and the context of literary world. His articles ＂The lost of original country＂ and ＂The blind Spots in N- ative Literature＂ can be regarded as companion pieces because both of them are directed to the tendency of separatism implied in Shi Ming＇s History of Taiwan Independence and, in some ambiguous words such as ＂Taiwan-center theory＂ in Ye Shitao＇s works called ＂Introduction to Taiwan native literature history＂. Nevertheless, Zhong Lihe＇s defect is that he couldn＇t distinguish China＇s ＂reality＂ from the inevitable confusion and labor pains of new China, which shook his idea of national identity. And the lesson still has its important realistic significance today.
