北京理工大学学报:社会科学版
北京理工大學學報:社會科學版
북경리공대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
2012年
6期
14~21
,共null页
碳排放交易机制 减排技术投资 生产和库存
碳排放交易機製 減排技術投資 生產和庫存
탄배방교역궤제 감배기술투자 생산화고존
carbon emission trading mechanism;investment of emission reducing technology;production and inventory
全球气候变化问题已经引起世界各国的高度关注,减少二氧化碳排放成为国际共识。为此推出的减排机制——碳排放交易机制必将对企业的决策产生重要影响。为探讨碳排放交易机制以及减排技术投资对制造型企业的生产库存决策的影响,基于Arrow—Cadin模型建立碳排放交易机制下的动态生产库存模型,分析减排技术投资可变时制造型企业的最优生产率、库存水平、成本、碳交易量与碳排放量,并与不存在碳排放交易机制的情况进行对比。研究结果表明:任碳排放交易机制下,制造商倾向于减少碳排放,出售部分碳排放配额,生产计划波动性减少,生产库存成本增加,总成本下降;增加减排技术投资,制造商会出售更多的碳排放配额,生产计划波动性增加,库存下降,总成本进一步下降。
全毬氣候變化問題已經引起世界各國的高度關註,減少二氧化碳排放成為國際共識。為此推齣的減排機製——碳排放交易機製必將對企業的決策產生重要影響。為探討碳排放交易機製以及減排技術投資對製造型企業的生產庫存決策的影響,基于Arrow—Cadin模型建立碳排放交易機製下的動態生產庫存模型,分析減排技術投資可變時製造型企業的最優生產率、庫存水平、成本、碳交易量與碳排放量,併與不存在碳排放交易機製的情況進行對比。研究結果錶明:任碳排放交易機製下,製造商傾嚮于減少碳排放,齣售部分碳排放配額,生產計劃波動性減少,生產庫存成本增加,總成本下降;增加減排技術投資,製造商會齣售更多的碳排放配額,生產計劃波動性增加,庫存下降,總成本進一步下降。
전구기후변화문제이경인기세계각국적고도관주,감소이양화탄배방성위국제공식。위차추출적감배궤제——탄배방교역궤제필장대기업적결책산생중요영향。위탐토탄배방교역궤제이급감배기술투자대제조형기업적생산고존결책적영향,기우Arrow—Cadin모형건립탄배방교역궤제하적동태생산고존모형,분석감배기술투자가변시제조형기업적최우생산솔、고존수평、성본、탄교역량여탄배방량,병여불존재탄배방교역궤제적정황진행대비。연구결과표명:임탄배방교역궤제하,제조상경향우감소탄배방,출수부분탄배방배액,생산계화파동성감소,생산고존성본증가,총성본하강;증가감배기술투자,제조상회출수경다적탄배방배액,생산계화파동성증가,고존하강,총성본진일보하강。
Climate changing has attracted the world's attention and the reduction of carbon emission has become international consensus. Carbon emission trading as one of the most effective carbon reducing mechanisms will have impact on manufacturers' decisions inevitably. This paper aims to study the effects of carbon emission trading and carbon reducing investment on the production-inventory strategy. Based on the well-known Arrow-Carlin model, a dynamic production-inventory model was built in the context of carbon emission trading. The optimal production rate, inventory level, total cost, carbon trading and emission were compared before carbon emission trading and thereafter. Furthermore, this paper analyzed the production-inventory strategy with the changing of carbon reducing investment. The results showed that manufacturers tended to sell part of their emission permits and production plan became more fiat; although the cost of production and inventory rose, the total cost dropped; when the investment of emission reducing technology went up, more permits would be sold and production plan fluctuated more severely, which leaded to a lower inventory and total cost.