中国行政管理
中國行政管理
중국행정관리
Chinese Public Administration
2013年
1期
50~54
,共null页
政府绩效 绩效评估 结果偏差
政府績效 績效評估 結果偏差
정부적효 적효평고 결과편차
government performance, performance evaluation, result distortions
长期以来，政府绩效评估被当作政府改革最有效的工具，得到了各国政府的高度重视。然而，何为政府绩效却缺乏理论上的解释；如何评估政府绩效，政府绩效评估结果是否存在着偏差，又能否消除以及如何消除等问题至今也没有厘清。本文通过对上述问题的讨论，试图构建一个认知政府绩效评估结果偏差的理论框架。研究得出以下结论：政府绩效的本质是真实政府与理想政府的契合程度，即实现其应有之职能的程度；绩效评估是政府绩效由模糊平衡到相对准确问责的过程；政府绩效评估的出现使得政府绩效有理想值、真实值和评估值的分野；政府绩效评估结果存在着纯偏差和准偏差，其中准偏差是可以也应该消除的。在此基础上，本文对当前中国的政府绩效评估提出了相对的政策建议。
長期以來，政府績效評估被噹作政府改革最有效的工具，得到瞭各國政府的高度重視。然而，何為政府績效卻缺乏理論上的解釋；如何評估政府績效，政府績效評估結果是否存在著偏差，又能否消除以及如何消除等問題至今也沒有釐清。本文通過對上述問題的討論，試圖構建一箇認知政府績效評估結果偏差的理論框架。研究得齣以下結論：政府績效的本質是真實政府與理想政府的契閤程度，即實現其應有之職能的程度；績效評估是政府績效由模糊平衡到相對準確問責的過程；政府績效評估的齣現使得政府績效有理想值、真實值和評估值的分野；政府績效評估結果存在著純偏差和準偏差，其中準偏差是可以也應該消除的。在此基礎上，本文對噹前中國的政府績效評估提齣瞭相對的政策建議。
장기이래，정부적효평고피당작정부개혁최유효적공구，득도료각국정부적고도중시。연이，하위정부적효각결핍이론상적해석；여하평고정부적효，정부적효평고결과시부존재착편차，우능부소제이급여하소제등문제지금야몰유전청。본문통과대상술문제적토론，시도구건일개인지정부적효평고결과편차적이론광가。연구득출이하결론：정부적효적본질시진실정부여이상정부적계합정도，즉실현기응유지직능적정도；적효평고시정부적효유모호평형도상대준학문책적과정；정부적효평고적출현사득정부적효유이상치、진실치화평고치적분야；정부적효평고결과존재착순편차화준편차，기중준편차시가이야응해소제적。재차기출상，본문대당전중국적정부적효평고제출료상대적정책건의。
For a long period,the government performance evaluation is one of the most effective tools for government reform, which acquires high attention of governments throughout the world. However, due to some reasons, how to define the key features of the government performance, how to evaluate the performance evaluation in a rational way, how to better understand the distortion in this evaluation process, are the main problems faced by the academic research. Through the discussion of above problems, this paper draws following conclusions by constructing a theoretical framework for deepening the understanding on government performance evaluation result distortions., the nature of the government performance evaluation is based on the matching degree between the real government and ideal govern- ment,namely the realization degree of government functions. The government performance evaluation is a process from a fuzzy balance to a relatively accurate accountability achievement. The government performance evaluation can be divided into three items., ideal--value based outcome, practical--value based outcome and evaluative--value based outcome. Therefore, the government performance evaluation will generate inherent distortions and assertive distor- tions~and the assertive distortions can be and should be eliminated. According to above research findings, this paper forms some corresponding policy suggestions regarding to government performance evaluation in China.
