CAJ | 학술논문

程序抗诉具有重要的诉讼价值。在西方国家,程序抗诉的立法可以区分为附属立法、独立立法和混合立法三种模式。我国在检察机关针对法院审判违反法定诉讼程序情形提出程序抗诉的法律规范方面存在较多的问题,以致无法有效彰显程序公正的理念和实现抗诉制度的功能。为此,应当立足实际,借鉴其他国家立法经验,从区分事实抗诉理由和程序抗诉理由、明确列举程序抗诉的绝对理由、确立为法律利益的非常抗诉等方面完善我国程序抗诉的立法。
정서항소구유중요적소송개치。재서방국가,정서항소적입법가이구분위부속입법、독립입법화혼합입법삼충모식。아국재검찰궤관침대법원심판위반법정소송정서정형제출정서항소적법률규범방면존재교다적문제,이치무법유효창현정서공정적이념화실현항소제도적공능。위차,응당립족실제,차감기타국가입법경험,종구분사실항소이유화정서항소이유、명학열거정서항소적절대이유、학립위법률이익적비상항소등방면완선아국정서항소적입법。
The procedural protest has important litigation values.There are three legislation types of procedural protest,subordinate legislation type,independent legislation type and mixed legislation type.The legislation of procedural protest In level of the legislation of procedural protest,there are experiences to follow in Japan,France and U.S.A etc.The law about procedural protest against the illegal trial procedures of court is imperfect.This can not effectively highlight the idea of procedural fairness and achieve the functions of protest system.We should be based on practice,learning from the experiences of developed countries,perfect the law of procedural protest,from the aspects of distinguishing fact protest reason and procedural protest reason,specifically enumerating the absolute reason for the procedural protest,and establishing the specifical protest for the legal interests etc.