CAJ | 학술논문

采用青海省乐都县3个村105份土地退化成本效益调查问卷的数据,利用生产函数模型通过评估林业重点工程（尤其是退耕还林工程）和GEFOP12项目对农户总收入、以土地为基础的收入和非农收入的影响,从而达到监测林业重点工程和GEFOP12项目的成本效益分析。结论显示,农户参于退耕还林工程增加了样本农户以土地为基础的收入,对总收入和非农收入没有产生显著影响,GEFOP12项目对样本农户的非农收入和总收入产生显著影响;通过对比内部收益率和投资回收期可以看出退耕还林工程的成本效益分析结果明显地优于GEFOP12项目的成本效益分析结果。
채용청해성악도현3개촌105빈토지퇴화성본효익조사문권적수거,이용생산함수모형통과평고임업중점공정（우기시퇴경환림공정）화GEFOP12항목대농호총수입、이토지위기출적수입화비농수입적영향,종이체도감측임업중점공정화GEFOP12항목적성본효익분석。결론현시,농호삼우퇴경환림공정증가료양본농호이토지위기출적수입,대총수입화비농수입몰유산생현저영향,GEFOP12항목대양본농호적비농수입화총수입산생현저영향;통과대비내부수익솔화투자회수기가이간출퇴경환림공정적성본효익분석결과명현지우우GEFOP12항목적성본효익분석결과。
In this paper, three villages, Ledu, Qinghai Province, is taken as an example, we use the 105 land degradation cost-effective questionnaires data and the production function approach to analyze the effect of forestry projects （especially the Sloping Land Conversion Program） and GEFOP12 on total income, land-based income and non-farm income for farmers. On the basis of above, we can get the cost-benefit analysis of forestry projects and GEFOP12.The outcomes revealed that farmer participation in SLCP can increase their land-based income, but it has no significant effects on total income and non-farm income for farmers, GEFOP12 have an active effect on non-farm income and total income for farmers. Contrast of internal rate of return and the period for return on investment show up that the results of cost-benefit analysis on SLCP is better than that of GEFOP12’s.