CAJ | 학술논문

以往对政策周期过程的研究视角多数集中于政策制定与政策评估等环节，政策执行成为一个“遗漏的环节”。20世纪60年代中后期，政府实施的政策中大部分没能达到预期的目标，这使得人们对政策研究的视角逐渐由政策制定转向了政策执行，提出了许多有关政策执行的理论和模型。政策执行研究的范式，经历了由“以政策为中心的途径”或“政策制定者透视”的“自上而下”范式向“关注影响政策执行过程中的各种复杂因素”的“自下而上”范式，再向“试图建立一个集前两者优点于一身的整合性概念框架，并对执行进行动态探讨”的“整合-系络”范式的转变。
이왕대정책주기과정적연구시각다수집중우정책제정여정책평고등배절，정책집행성위일개“유루적배절”。20세기60년대중후기，정부실시적정책중대부분몰능체도예기적목표，저사득인문대정책연구적시각축점유정책제정전향료정책집행，제출료허다유관정책집행적이론화모형。정책집행연구적범식，경력료유“이정책위중심적도경”혹“정책제정자투시”적“자상이하”범식향“관주영향정책집행과정중적각충복잡인소”적“자하이상”범식，재향“시도건립일개집전량자우점우일신적정합성개념광가，병대집행진행동태탐토”적“정합-계락”범식적전변。
Previous research on policy cycles mainly focus on such aspects as policy making and policy evaluation, but ignore the aspect of policy implementation. Since the mid- and late 1960s , most of the government policies have failed to result in achievements as expected, which triggered the shift from policy making to policy implementation in policy studies and inspired a number of new theories and models on policy implementation. Paradigms for policy studies have shifted from the top-down＂ paradigm characterized by the ＂policy-centered approach＂ or the ＂policy-maker perspective＂ to the ＂bot- tom-up＂ paradigm that ＂concentrates on various factors which influence the process of implementation＂. And finally,it has evolved into the paradigm of ＂integrative system network＂ that ＂is capable of combining the advantages of the former two paradigms to form an integrative conceptual framework and conducting dynamic exploration of the process of implementa- tion. ＂