CAJ | 학술논문

作为围绕建构经验论的新争论而出现的新型科学实在论，对理论实体的探索大都避免超越语言框架直接与外在世界接触。这种新型科学实在论呈现出三种倾向，其前景不容乐观。在对实在论之争进行清算的基础上，劳斯作了与工具主义的厘清，主张真理紧缩论；通过置身于由目标、实践与用具构成的塑造而非表象中来重释实在的意义和独立性。这是科学实践哲学在历史地演化着的实践综合体中对实在论之争的超越。
작위위요건구경험론적신쟁론이출현적신형과학실재론，대이론실체적탐색대도피면초월어언광가직접여외재세계접촉。저충신형과학실재론정현출삼충경향，기전경불용악관。재대실재론지쟁진행청산적기출상，로사작료여공구주의적전청，주장진리긴축론；통과치신우유목표、실천여용구구성적소조이비표상중래중석실재적의의화독립성。저시과학실천철학재역사지연화착적실천종합체중대실재론지쟁적초월。
It is not promising that there are three sorts of tendencies in the transformation of scientific realism caused by the new controversy over the constructive empiricism. The studies of the new scientific realism on theoretical entities are mainly in the linguistic framework instead of dealing with the outside world directly. Having analyzed the faults of the controversy over the scientific realism, Rouse differentiates his theory from the instrumentalism, advocates the deflationary account of truth, and reinterprets the meaning and independence of reality by the configuration of scientific targets, practice and equipment rather than the abstract representation. Rouse＇ s practical philosophy of science has transcended the above mentioned controversies in the ever- evolving comprehensive practice.