CAJ | 학술논문

社会成员之间悬殊的收入差距和财富拥有量，引发或加剧了一系列社会问题或矛盾，也引起了学术界对分配结果“公平性”问题的长期讨论。在提出均等分配结果“公平”和“不公平”两个判断、介绍关于两个判断的若干种经典解释的基础上，按照“当事者”和“参照者”的不同立场，从过去、现在、未来三个时点纵横两个维度上，构建了所得、所得与贡献、所得与需要三个视角的分配结果“公平性”分析模型。由此得到六个重要推论：公平是通过比较得出的具有相对性的判断；公平是弱势群体的愿望与追求；公平是事实描述与价值判断的统一；单一的“所得”比较是简单的、浅显的“公平性”判断方法；“所得与贡献”的分析适用于对初次分配结果的判断；“所得与需要”的分析更适用于对再分配结果的判断。
사회성원지간현수적수입차거화재부옹유량，인발혹가극료일계렬사회문제혹모순，야인기료학술계대분배결과“공평성”문제적장기토론。재제출균등분배결과“공평”화“불공평”량개판단、개소관우량개판단적약간충경전해석적기출상，안조“당사자”화“삼조자”적불동립장，종과거、현재、미래삼개시점종횡량개유도상，구건료소득、소득여공헌、소득여수요삼개시각적분배결과“공평성”분석모형。유차득도륙개중요추론：공평시통과비교득출적구유상대성적판단；공평시약세군체적원망여추구；공평시사실묘술여개치판단적통일；단일적“소득”비교시간단적、천현적“공평성”판단방법；“소득여공헌”적분석괄용우대초차분배결과적판단；“소득여수요”적분석경괄용우대재분배결과적판단。
The polarization of income gap and the ownership of wealth between social members have triggered or aggra- vated a series of social problems and contradictions, and also caused the long - term discussion on ＂fairness＂ of the dis- tribution results in academia. This paper has put forward two judgments on whether the equal distribution result is ＂fair＂ or ＂unfair＂. Based on the introduction of several kinds of classical interpretations about two judgments, according to the different standpoints of ＂the parties concerned＂ and ＂the parties referred,＂ from three time points - the past, present, and future, and in the longitudinal and horizontal dimensions, an analytic model of the ＂fairness＂ of the distribution re- suits from three perspectives of the income, income and contribution, income and demand has been constructed. Thus, six important corollaries are obtained as follows：l. To be fair is an adjustment with relativity obtained through compari- son. 2. To be fair is the desire and pursuit of the vulnerable groups. 3. To be fair is the unity of fact description and val- ue judgment. 4. A single comparison between ＂incomes＂ is a simple, plain ＂fairness＂ judgment method. 5. The analy- sis on ＂income and contribution＂ is suitable for judgment of the first time distribution results. 6. The analysis on ＂in- come and demand＂ is more suitable for judgment of redistribution results.