CAJ | 학술논문

在我国，相对独立的高职教师职称评审标准一直处于悬缺状态。长期套用综合性大学教师职称评审标准，导致高职教师专业发展产生不同程度的异化，并诱发一系列系统性问题。究其原因，“双师导向”的高职教师专业发展不同于“学术导向”的综合性大学教师的专业发展。依据系统理论分析发现，诱发诸多问题的根本动因在于“元素移植”式的“套用标准”。建议在研发相对独立的高职教师职称评审新标准时，应遵循独立设定、双师导向、分类考量等三条原则，并提出调整科研标准，增设实践教学标准，增加教师技能标准等三项策略。
재아국，상대독립적고직교사직칭평심표준일직처우현결상태。장기투용종합성대학교사직칭평심표준，도치고직교사전업발전산생불동정도적이화，병유발일계렬계통성문제。구기원인，“쌍사도향”적고직교사전업발전불동우“학술도향”적종합성대학교사적전업발전。의거계통이론분석발현，유발제다문제적근본동인재우“원소이식”식적“투용표준”。건의재연발상대독립적고직교사직칭평심신표준시，응준순독립설정、쌍사도향、분류고량등삼조원칙，병제출조정과연표준，증설실천교학표준，증가교사기능표준등삼항책략。
In China, professional title evaluation standards of higher vocational colleges＇ faculty have been absent for a long time. The embedding usage of professional title evaluation standards designed for university faculty which have caused some alienations of higher vocational faculty＇ s professional development and a series of systematic problems. The reason is that the professional development of higher vocational colleges＇ faculty is orientated by ＂double functions＂, that is quite different from that of universities＇ faculty which orientated by academic . Analyzed by systematic theory, the embedding us- age of professional title evaluation standards designed for university faculty is the fundamental motivations of the systematic problems. It is suggested that relatively separate professional title evaluation standards of higher vocational colleges＇ faculty should be formulated and three principals should be abided. Finally, three strategies have been advised.