中国社会科学院研究生院学报
中國社會科學院研究生院學報
중국사회과학원연구생원학보
Academic Journal Graduate School Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
2013年
1期
86~90
,共null页
开庭审理 调查讯问审理 规范职权 保障权利
開庭審理 調查訊問審理 規範職權 保障權利
개정심리 조사신문심리 규범직권 보장권리
hold a hearing; inquiry hearing; regulate the exercise of power; safeguard human rights
新刑诉法对二审审理方式的规定进行了修改,为提高二审开庭率,增强二审程序的公正性提供了可能。但修改后的二审审理方式依然存在问题。从立法规定层面看,新刑诉法对二审审理方式选择标准的确定,难以体现刑事诉讼规制职权与保障权利的基本精神。应着眼于以规范职权和保障权利为基本原则,通过司法解释明确二审审理方式的选择标准对其予以进一步完善。从司法实践层面来看,现有的配套制度和措施与扩大二审开庭范围的要求不相适应。需要通过进一步的制度和机制改革,实现二审开庭的常态化和实质化。
新刑訴法對二審審理方式的規定進行瞭脩改,為提高二審開庭率,增彊二審程序的公正性提供瞭可能。但脩改後的二審審理方式依然存在問題。從立法規定層麵看,新刑訴法對二審審理方式選擇標準的確定,難以體現刑事訴訟規製職權與保障權利的基本精神。應著眼于以規範職權和保障權利為基本原則,通過司法解釋明確二審審理方式的選擇標準對其予以進一步完善。從司法實踐層麵來看,現有的配套製度和措施與擴大二審開庭範圍的要求不相適應。需要通過進一步的製度和機製改革,實現二審開庭的常態化和實質化。
신형소법대이심심리방식적규정진행료수개,위제고이심개정솔,증강이심정서적공정성제공료가능。단수개후적이심심리방식의연존재문제。종입법규정층면간,신형소법대이심심리방식선택표준적학정,난이체현형사소송규제직권여보장권리적기본정신。응착안우이규범직권화보장권리위기본원칙,통과사법해석명학이심심리방식적선택표준대기여이진일보완선。종사법실천층면래간,현유적배투제도화조시여확대이심개정범위적요구불상괄응。수요통과진일보적제도화궤제개혁,실현이심개정적상태화화실질화。
The provisions of the mode of trial in the second instance have been reformed in the new criminal procedure law,which is helpful to enlarge the scope of court sessions and strengthen the fairness of the second instance.However,there are also some problems after the provisions are modified.From the perspective of legislation,the standard of the mode in the second instance does not comply with the idea of power regulation and right protection,which should be adopted to clarify the standard of the mode in the second instance by making judicial interpretation.From the perspective of judicial practice,the supporting systems and measures which related to the mode of trial in the second instance do not comply with the requirement to enlarge the scope of court sessions.So it is supposed to reform and make the trial of the second instance more normal and substantial.
