国际经贸探索
國際經貿探索
국제경무탐색
International Economics and Trade Research
2013年
2期
34~44
,共null页
异质性所有制结构 技术创新 技术溢出效应
異質性所有製結構 技術創新 技術溢齣效應
이질성소유제결구 기술창신 기술일출효응
heterogeneous ownership structure; technological innovation; spillover effect
文章将国有企业、集体企业等四类不同所有制结构类型纳入FDI对制造业技术创新溢出影响的分析框架,考察异质所有制结构的FDI技术效率溢出程度。利用2005~2010年30个制造业行业的面板数据.运用差分广义矩法(GMM)按照企业所有制结构分类检验外商直接投资对行业技术创新的技术溢出效应。结果表明,各类企业自身的生产制造能力提升是制造业技术创新的基础,外资技术溢出对技术创新的影响因企业所有制结构的不同呈现出较大的差异,按销售产值加权的溢出效率对各类所有制企业所在行业的技术创新产生了显著的正面效应,且私营企业的表现最为突出。但是,按从业人员加权的技术溢出结果是国有企业和集体企业是正面积极影响.私营企业和外资企业是负面消极影响。且负面影响最大的是私营企业。
文章將國有企業、集體企業等四類不同所有製結構類型納入FDI對製造業技術創新溢齣影響的分析框架,攷察異質所有製結構的FDI技術效率溢齣程度。利用2005~2010年30箇製造業行業的麵闆數據.運用差分廣義矩法(GMM)按照企業所有製結構分類檢驗外商直接投資對行業技術創新的技術溢齣效應。結果錶明,各類企業自身的生產製造能力提升是製造業技術創新的基礎,外資技術溢齣對技術創新的影響因企業所有製結構的不同呈現齣較大的差異,按銷售產值加權的溢齣效率對各類所有製企業所在行業的技術創新產生瞭顯著的正麵效應,且私營企業的錶現最為突齣。但是,按從業人員加權的技術溢齣結果是國有企業和集體企業是正麵積極影響.私營企業和外資企業是負麵消極影響。且負麵影響最大的是私營企業。
문장장국유기업、집체기업등사류불동소유제결구류형납입FDI대제조업기술창신일출영향적분석광가,고찰이질소유제결구적FDI기술효솔일출정도。이용2005~2010년30개제조업행업적면판수거.운용차분엄의구법(GMM)안조기업소유제결구분류검험외상직접투자대행업기술창신적기술일출효응。결과표명,각류기업자신적생산제조능력제승시제조업기술창신적기출,외자기술일출대기술창신적영향인기업소유제결구적불동정현출교대적차이,안소수산치가권적일출효솔대각류소유제기업소재행업적기술창신산생료현저적정면효응,차사영기업적표현최위돌출。단시,안종업인원가권적기술일출결과시국유기업화집체기업시정면적겁영향.사영기업화외자기업시부면소겁영향。차부면영향최대적시사영기업。
Integrating the four different ownership structures of state-owned enterprises, collective enterprises and so on into the analytical framework of FDI' spillover effects on technological innovation in manufacturing, this paper examines the extent of spillover of heterogeneous ownership structure. By using the industry panel data from 2005 to 2010 and applying GMM method, it estimates the technical spillover of technological innovation according to the ownership structure classification. The enhanced manufacturing ability of various types of enterprises is proven to be the basis of technological innovation in manufacturing. The spillover effect of technological innovation appears to have a considerable difference because of different heterogeneous ownership structure. The spillover efficiency weighted by the sales value of industry technological innovation of various ownership enterprises is obviously positive, and the performance of private enterprises is the most outstanding. However, the results of the spillover weighted by the employed persons are different. State-owned enterprises and collective enterprises are positively affected, while private enterprises and foreign enterprises are negatively affected, with the largest negative effect on private enterprises.