CAJ | 학술논문

刑法典与犯罪论体系的关系是犯罪论体系论争的一个前提性问题。对此，主张“维持论”的学者提出了“刑法典对犯罪论具有制约关系”的命题。通过对德国犯罪论与刑法典关系史的考察，可以看出，无论是构成要件、违法性还是罪责，都不是德国刑法典的产物，而是德国刑法学者智慧的产物。更为重要的是，阶层犯罪论体系的这些基本概念，通过在刑法学界形成共识之后，形塑了德国刑法典的发展。我国犯罪论体系的建构不应拘泥于刑法典本身的规定，因此引入德国阶层犯罪论体系并不存在障碍。
형법전여범죄론체계적관계시범죄론체계논쟁적일개전제성문제。대차，주장“유지론”적학자제출료“형법전대범죄론구유제약관계”적명제。통과대덕국범죄론여형법전관계사적고찰，가이간출，무론시구성요건、위법성환시죄책，도불시덕국형법전적산물，이시덕국형법학자지혜적산물。경위중요적시，계층범죄론체계적저사기본개념，통과재형법학계형성공식지후，형소료덕국형법전적발전。아국범죄론체계적건구불응구니우형법전본신적규정，인차인입덕국계층범죄론체계병불존재장애。
The relationship between the penal code and the structure of crime is the prerequisite for the discussion on the structure of crime. In response to this issue, the scholars who argue for the reten- tion of the former Soviet＇s theory of the structure of crime have proposed that Penal Code determine the structure of crime. Through a historical analysis of the relationship between German penal codes and their theories of the structure of crime, we can see that the definition of crime, wrongdoing and culpa- bility are not the product of penal codes. On the contrary, they are the theoretical product of German criminal law scholars. More importantly, the theory of the basic structure of crime has shaped the im- provement of German penal codes. The construction of Chinese theory of the structure of crime should not be restricted to China＇s Penal Code. Therefore, there is no barrier to the introduction of German theory of the structure of crime.