CAJ | 학술논문

金与南宋对峙，其文艺思想、诗学批评差异很大。作为当时南北诗学的代表人物，元好问和严羽对宋诗持论同中有异。其相同处表现在两人都对宋诗持批评态度，不同之处在于元好问论诗无门户之见，对宋诗的评价侧重于思想内容且较为客观中肯。严羽则门户之见森严，对宋诗批评过甚。探究两人宋诗持论差异之成因，可见其主要受文化思潮、国情时势以及自身素养等多方面的影响。
금여남송대치，기문예사상、시학비평차이흔대。작위당시남북시학적대표인물，원호문화엄우대송시지론동중유이。기상동처표현재량인도대송시지비평태도，불동지처재우원호문론시무문호지견，대송시적평개측중우사상내용차교위객관중긍。엄우칙문호지견삼엄，대송시비평과심。탐구량인송시지론차이지성인，가견기주요수문화사조、국정시세이급자신소양등다방면적영향。
The confrontation between the Jin and the Southern Song Dynasties endows the birth of different literary thoughts and poetic criticism. Although both Yuan Haowen and Yan Yu, respectively representing the Northern and Southern poetic theories, held a critical attitude towards the Song poetic theories, they differentiated greatly. Yuan is immune of sectarianism and hence more neutral and unbiased in his criticism on the content of the poetry, while Yan is subjugated by sectarian bias and hence extreme in attitude and diction. This paper explores the reasons leading to their differentiations from the perspectives of ideological influences, national circumstances, and self-cultivations.