教育学报
教育學報
교육학보
Journal of Educational Studies
2013年
1期
55~62
,共null页
批判 辩证讨论 批判教育 教育批判 教育哲学 方法论
批判 辯證討論 批判教育 教育批判 教育哲學 方法論
비판 변증토론 비판교육 교육비판 교육철학 방법론
criticism; dialectical argument ; critical education; criticism in education; educational philosophy ; methodology
哲学批判的本质是对“更好可能”的开放式追寻。哲学批判有关“反”或“非”的立场,通常建立在人们“质疑”既有事态价值品质的基础上,并集中表现为不同学说或观点之间的一种“辩证讨论”。学界有关“批判话语”的复杂意向,使得我国教育研究中的批判实践往往游离了其学术根基,进而致使教育理论在当前的社会危机中日益消减了其所应有的社会影响力。为重振中国教育的公信力,中国教育学界不仅需要在学界内部重建并严格恪守教育批判的学术原则,而且它还必须能够真诚地接受来自教育实践者对其理论品性的质疑与挑战,从而自觉地担负起重建中国批判教育实践的历史使命。
哲學批判的本質是對“更好可能”的開放式追尋。哲學批判有關“反”或“非”的立場,通常建立在人們“質疑”既有事態價值品質的基礎上,併集中錶現為不同學說或觀點之間的一種“辯證討論”。學界有關“批判話語”的複雜意嚮,使得我國教育研究中的批判實踐往往遊離瞭其學術根基,進而緻使教育理論在噹前的社會危機中日益消減瞭其所應有的社會影響力。為重振中國教育的公信力,中國教育學界不僅需要在學界內部重建併嚴格恪守教育批判的學術原則,而且它還必鬚能夠真誠地接受來自教育實踐者對其理論品性的質疑與挑戰,從而自覺地擔負起重建中國批判教育實踐的歷史使命。
철학비판적본질시대“경호가능”적개방식추심。철학비판유관“반”혹“비”적립장,통상건립재인문“질의”기유사태개치품질적기출상,병집중표현위불동학설혹관점지간적일충“변증토론”。학계유관“비판화어”적복잡의향,사득아국교육연구중적비판실천왕왕유리료기학술근기,진이치사교육이론재당전적사회위궤중일익소감료기소응유적사회영향력。위중진중국교육적공신력,중국교육학계불부수요재학계내부중건병엄격각수교육비판적학술원칙,이차타환필수능구진성지접수래자교육실천자대기이론품성적질의여도전,종이자각지담부기중건중국비판교육실천적역사사명。
The nature of philosophical criticism is to go after a "better reality" openly. The "opposite" or "negative" position of philosophical criticism is usually based on people "doubting" the value and quality of existing things, which is represented by a "dialectical argument" between different theories or viewpoints. The complex orientation in the academic "critical discourses" has made the critical practice in education drift away from its academic basis and has further made educational theories lessen its proper social influence in contemporary social crisis. To rebuild the credibility of China's education, the educational aca- demia in China should not only rebuild and scrupulously abide by the academic principle of criticism in education field but also could accept the doubts and challenges on the quality of theories from educational prac- titioners sincerely, and then automatically take on the historical mission of rebuilding critical education practice in China.