中国人口资源与环境
中國人口資源與環境
중국인구자원여배경
China Polulation.Resources and Environment
2013年
3期
44~48
,共null页
供应链 可再生能源 收益 分配 政策
供應鏈 可再生能源 收益 分配 政策
공응련 가재생능원 수익 분배 정책
supply chain; renewable energy power; benefit; distribution; policy
可再生能源电力政策直接影响各相关主体的收益.造成不同的主体选择行为。已有研究较少考虑可再生能源政策对电力供应链相关主体收益及其分配的影响。将可再生能源政策按照价格和数量的管制程度划分为四种.借助博弈理论和两级供应链理论,分析各方利益主体在不同政策下的收益分配函数,并对推导结果进行对比、延伸。研究后发现:政府对可再生能源电力价格或数量的政府管制政策。有利于提高供应链双方收益。但无法保障收益能够被合理地分配。这主要取决于制定的电价或数量能否量化可再生能源电力的额外成本;而配额制通过控制配额保证可再生能源发展目标的实现。借助市场机制调节供应链双方收益分配。是可再生能源政策的改革方向。
可再生能源電力政策直接影響各相關主體的收益.造成不同的主體選擇行為。已有研究較少攷慮可再生能源政策對電力供應鏈相關主體收益及其分配的影響。將可再生能源政策按照價格和數量的管製程度劃分為四種.藉助博弈理論和兩級供應鏈理論,分析各方利益主體在不同政策下的收益分配函數,併對推導結果進行對比、延伸。研究後髮現:政府對可再生能源電力價格或數量的政府管製政策。有利于提高供應鏈雙方收益。但無法保障收益能夠被閤理地分配。這主要取決于製定的電價或數量能否量化可再生能源電力的額外成本;而配額製通過控製配額保證可再生能源髮展目標的實現。藉助市場機製調節供應鏈雙方收益分配。是可再生能源政策的改革方嚮。
가재생능원전력정책직접영향각상관주체적수익.조성불동적주체선택행위。이유연구교소고필가재생능원정책대전력공응련상관주체수익급기분배적영향。장가재생능원정책안조개격화수량적관제정도화분위사충.차조박혁이론화량급공응련이론,분석각방이익주체재불동정책하적수익분배함수,병대추도결과진행대비、연신。연구후발현:정부대가재생능원전력개격혹수량적정부관제정책。유리우제고공응련쌍방수익。단무법보장수익능구피합리지분배。저주요취결우제정적전개혹수량능부양화가재생능원전력적액외성본;이배액제통과공제배액보증가재생능원발전목표적실현。차조시장궤제조절공응련쌍방수익분배。시가재생능원정책적개혁방향。
Renewable electricity policy directly influences the benefit of relevant parts, which leads to the different behavior choices. Research on renewable energy policy has less consideration on benefit distribution among the power supply chain parts. The renewable energy policy is divided into four kinds by the intervention on price and quantity. Based on the stack berg game theory and two supply chain theory, the paper analyzes the benefit distribution function between grids and power generation companies with the different intervention policies, and deduces the results. It is found that the policy about controlling over the price or the quantities would contribute to the benefit improvement, rather than the rational benefit distribution, compared to market automatic adjustment. In addition, the quota should be the main direction for renewable energy policies, which could ensure the widespread use of the renewable electricity by controlling the quota quantities, and could better protect both parts benefit through the internalized additional costs by price relaxes.