CAJ | 학술논문

评价中心是一种高保真度的情境模拟,它被设计用来在多种与工作相关的活动中测量多项维度。30年来的大量研究发现,评价中心具备良好的内容效度和效标关联效度,但构想效度却始终不理想,评价中心评分反映的总是由活动而非预先设想的维度带来的效应。这一评价中心＂构想效度谜题＂吸引了大量研究关注,并逐步形成了维度中心取向、活动中心取向及交互作用取向三种主要观点,分别主张控制各种误差因素以改善维度测量、放弃维度而转向活动或任务以及关注维度与活动的共同作用。未来研究应在传统的维度中心取向之外给予活动中心取向足够重视,并重点发展交互作用取向。
평개중심시일충고보진도적정경모의,타피설계용래재다충여공작상관적활동중측량다항유도。30년래적대량연구발현,평개중심구비량호적내용효도화효표관련효도,단구상효도각시종불이상,평개중심평분반영적총시유활동이비예선설상적유도대래적효응。저일평개중심＂구상효도미제＂흡인료대량연구관주,병축보형성료유도중심취향、활동중심취향급교호작용취향삼충주요관점,분별주장공제각충오차인소이개선유도측량、방기유도이전향활동혹임무이급관주유도여활동적공동작용。미래연구응재전통적유도중심취향지외급여활동중심취향족구중시,병중점발전교호작용취향。
As high-fidelity simulations, assessment centers （ACs） are designed to measure a number of dimensions in various job-related exercises. Over the past 30 years, a great deal of research has indicated that ACs exhibit high content and criterion-related validity, but low construct-related validity. AC ratings substantially reflect the effects of the exercises and not the dimensions they were designed to reflect. This so-called AC ＂construct validity puzzle＂ drew a lot of attention from researchers. Three main research perspectives have gradually emerged： dimension-based approach, exercise-based approach, and interactionist approach, which focus on controlling factors causing measurement errors to improve the quality of dimension measurement, removing the dimensions from AC framework and focusing solely on the exercises or tasks, and taking the interaction between dimensions and exercises into account, respectively. Future research should pay more attentions to the exercise-based approach beyond the traditional dimension-based approach, and place great emphasis on the interactionist approach.