北京体育大学学报
北京體育大學學報
북경체육대학학보
Journal of Beijing University of Physical Education
2013年
1期
51~54
,共null页
任弘 王馨塘 吴晓薇 程静
任弘 王馨塘 吳曉薇 程靜
임홍 왕형당 오효미 정정
三维扫描 人体形态 测量评价 身体形态测量
三維掃描 人體形態 測量評價 身體形態測量
삼유소묘 인체형태 측량평개 신체형태측량
3D scan; morphology; measurement and evaluation; morphology measurement
三维人体扫描与传统的身体形态测量方法相比,具有速度快、测试指标多、没有身体接触等优点,而测试精度则受解读三维图像的程序限制,目前该技术在体育领域的应用刚刚开始。使用德国HumanSo—lutions公司生产的Anthrosean3DVITUS三维人体扫描仪,对174人(男74人,女100人)的29项形态指标进行传统手工测量与三维扫描测量,对比两种测量方法的结果,有14项指标结果较为一致,误差小于3%。髂宽、胸宽和胸厚3项指标两种测量方法的差异率在10%以上,其余指标误差在3%~10%之间。两种测量方法中受试对象姿势不同、定位点不一致是造成误差的主要原因。结果提示研究人员在进行人体形态测量时应统一测试方法,不能将两种测量方法得到的测试结果相互替代进行研究。
三維人體掃描與傳統的身體形態測量方法相比,具有速度快、測試指標多、沒有身體接觸等優點,而測試精度則受解讀三維圖像的程序限製,目前該技術在體育領域的應用剛剛開始。使用德國HumanSo—lutions公司生產的Anthrosean3DVITUS三維人體掃描儀,對174人(男74人,女100人)的29項形態指標進行傳統手工測量與三維掃描測量,對比兩種測量方法的結果,有14項指標結果較為一緻,誤差小于3%。髂寬、胸寬和胸厚3項指標兩種測量方法的差異率在10%以上,其餘指標誤差在3%~10%之間。兩種測量方法中受試對象姿勢不同、定位點不一緻是造成誤差的主要原因。結果提示研究人員在進行人體形態測量時應統一測試方法,不能將兩種測量方法得到的測試結果相互替代進行研究。
삼유인체소묘여전통적신체형태측량방법상비,구유속도쾌、측시지표다、몰유신체접촉등우점,이측시정도칙수해독삼유도상적정서한제,목전해기술재체육영역적응용강강개시。사용덕국HumanSo—lutions공사생산적Anthrosean3DVITUS삼유인체소묘의,대174인(남74인,녀100인)적29항형태지표진행전통수공측량여삼유소묘측량,대비량충측량방법적결과,유14항지표결과교위일치,오차소우3%。가관、흉관화흉후3항지표량충측량방법적차이솔재10%이상,기여지표오차재3%~10%지간。량충측량방법중수시대상자세불동、정위점불일치시조성오차적주요원인。결과제시연구인원재진행인체형태측량시응통일측시방법,불능장량충측량방법득도적측시결과상호체대진행연구。
Compared with traditional body morphology measurement, 3D Body Scan technique has the advantage of fast speed, more evaluation indicators and no body contact. The measurement accuracy is restricted by the soft- ware reading the 3D image. This technology is just come to use in sports scientific research. 174 subjects (74 male, 100 female)was measured by Anthroscan 3 D VITUS made in Germany and also by traditional measurement, and got 29 body morphology indexes for comparison. Compared with the measuring results of professional researc- her, it found that 14 indexes' results were similar. The error rate was less than 3%. The difference rate between the spine width and thorax width and thickness was more than 10%. And the error rate in the others was 3% 10%. Difference posture and anchor point are main causes of error. The results indicated that the researchers shall adopt the same measurement method in measure the body morphology and could not cross use the results from the two different measurement ways in the research.