CAJ | 학술논문

科斯塔斯·杜兹纳是英国批判法学的领军者、西方精神分析法学的代表人物。他运用拉康的精神分析理论揭示了西方正统自由主义人权理论的内在悖论，指出福山宣告的历史的终结和人权的全面胜利并未来临，并且永远不会来临。宣告人权取得全面胜利实际上是在宣告人权死亡。按照自由主义人权哲学，权利名目不断增多、权利保护范围不断扩大表明人权在持续发展，最终将趋近“人的全面解放”。而杜兹纳则认为，“权利的爆炸”并不是通往人的解放之路，它将导致人的“碎片化”：权利越多，主体就越加分裂，而越加分裂的主体将愈加欲求权利，从而导致权利的新一轮增殖及主体的进一步分裂。权利愈多，就愈觉权利匮乏，这就是权利自我增殖的怪圈。要破解自由主义人权哲学的怪圈，必须引入他性伦理学，借助爱和团结，因此笛卡尔和康德确立的以自我为核心的伦理学必须扬弃。整体而言，作为西方世界衣食无虞的知识分子，杜兹纳的人权哲学在消弭过度的权利诉求方面更有价值，而在消除真正的权利匮乏及提高人权保障程度方面意义有限。
과사탑사·두자납시영국비판법학적령군자、서방정신분석법학적대표인물。타운용랍강적정신분석이론게시료서방정통자유주의인권이론적내재패론，지출복산선고적역사적종결화인권적전면성리병미래림，병차영원불회래림。선고인권취득전면성리실제상시재선고인권사망。안조자유주의인권철학，권리명목불단증다、권리보호범위불단확대표명인권재지속발전，최종장추근“인적전면해방”。이두자납칙인위，“권리적폭작”병불시통왕인적해방지로，타장도치인적“쇄편화”：권리월다，주체취월가분렬，이월가분렬적주체장유가욕구권리，종이도치권리적신일륜증식급주체적진일보분렬。권리유다，취유각권리궤핍，저취시권리자아증식적괴권。요파해자유주의인권철학적괴권，필수인입타성윤리학，차조애화단결，인차적잡이화강덕학립적이자아위핵심적윤리학필수양기。정체이언，작위서방세계의식무우적지식분자，두자납적인권철학재소미과도적권리소구방면경유개치，이재소제진정적권리궤핍급제고인권보장정도방면의의유한。
Costas Douzinas is a prominent scholar of the British Critical Legal Studies and the principal exponent of Psychoanalysis and Law Studies in the Western world. He applies Lacan＇ s Psychoanalysis theory to reveal the inherent paradox contained in the Western traditional Liberalism Theory of human rights. He points out that the ＂end of history＂ and the ＂full victory of human fights＂ proposed by Francis Fukuyama have not achieved yet, neither will approach ever. In fact, announcing the triumph of human rights is the declaration of death of human rights. In the light of Liberalism Theory of human rights, the increasing number of rights items as well as the expanding of the rights protection show that human rights have sustainably developed, approaching the ＂comprehensive human liberation＂ in the end. Douzinas, however, views that the ＂explosion of rights＂ is not the path leading to human liberation. The explosion of rights would result in ＂human fragmentation＂, the more rights are created, the further division is imposed on subjects. Accordingly,the increasing divided subjects seek more and more rights, which causes the new round of rights growth as well as the subjects division. This is the trap of the rights reproduction. To escape the trap, it is necessary to introduce the alterity Ethics, relying on love and solidarity. Therefore,the self-centered Ethics-established by Descartes and Kant-must be sublated. On the whole, as an intellectual living in the well-off Western society, Douzinas makes the contribution to prevent the excessive demand of rights. On the other hand, his human rights philosophy has the limits to respond to the real lack of rights as well as the improvement of human rights protection.