CAJ | 학술논문

文章考察了“文化工业”这一关键词在中国的变迁过程。上世纪80年代末90年代初，当中国还不具备成熟的文化工业时，法兰克福学派的文化工业理论引入导致了一场错位的中国文化工业批判。但是当进入21世纪后中国建立起真正的文化工业后，“文化工业”概念却被置换成了“文化产业”，并衍生出如“创意产业”等相关的概念，正面肯定并服务于文化工业。文章借用了布尔迪厄的场域分析方法，对这一现象背后的原因进行了初步探索，揭示出媒介文化研究场域的自主性正在削弱。
문장고찰료“문화공업”저일관건사재중국적변천과정。상세기80년대말90년대초，당중국환불구비성숙적문화공업시，법란극복학파적문화공업이론인입도치료일장착위적중국문화공업비판。단시당진입21세기후중국건립기진정적문화공업후，“문화공업”개념각피치환성료“문화산업”，병연생출여“창의산업”등상관적개념，정면긍정병복무우문화공업。문장차용료포이적액적장역분석방법，대저일현상배후적원인진행료초보탐색，게시출매개문화연구장역적자주성정재삭약。
This paper studies the changes of such a keyword as ＂culture industry＂（WenhuaGongye） in China. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, when the modem culture industry was not fully established in China, the introduc- tion of Frankfurt School＇ s culture industry theory caused a misplaced criticism against Chinese culture industry; whereas when culture industry was realized at the beginning of 21th century, the ＂culture industry＂（ Wenhua- Gongye） was displaced by the ＂culture industries＂（ WenhuaChangye ） , which also derived other concepts like ＂creative industy＂. These new concepts legitimize and serve the newly established culture industry. This paper u- ses Pierre Bourdieu＇ s field theory to explore the explanation of this phenomenon and finds out that the autonomy of the academic field is diminishing.