西安外国语大学学报
西安外國語大學學報
서안외국어대학학보
Journal of Xi'an Foreign Languages University
2013年
1期
35~38
,共null页
指称 语义外在论 语义内在论 辨别力
指稱 語義外在論 語義內在論 辨彆力
지칭 어의외재론 어의내재론 변별력
reference; meaning externalism ; meaning internalism; cognoscitive power
意义理论和指称理论一直是西方语言哲学研究的核心问题。无论是意义理论中的指称论还是指称理论都认为外在世界中存在着语言所表达的对应物,即指称,属于语义外在论的范畴。乔姆斯基持语义内在论观点,他认为语义先于语词,自然语言与思维或许没有弗雷格、皮尔士、塔斯基、卡尔纳普以及当代语义外在论哲学家普特南、克里普克等人所谈意义上的指称。人类在使用语言谈论事物的时候并非在谈论独立于思维的对象。经验与解释的世界是由人类丰富的辨别力(cognoscitive power)来构建的。乔姆斯基的语言指称观解决了西方语言哲学争论了一百多年的一些悖论问题,如迈农悖论、同一律与排中律等问题,给语言哲学研究提供了更为广阔的研究视角。
意義理論和指稱理論一直是西方語言哲學研究的覈心問題。無論是意義理論中的指稱論還是指稱理論都認為外在世界中存在著語言所錶達的對應物,即指稱,屬于語義外在論的範疇。喬姆斯基持語義內在論觀點,他認為語義先于語詞,自然語言與思維或許沒有弗雷格、皮爾士、塔斯基、卡爾納普以及噹代語義外在論哲學傢普特南、剋裏普剋等人所談意義上的指稱。人類在使用語言談論事物的時候併非在談論獨立于思維的對象。經驗與解釋的世界是由人類豐富的辨彆力(cognoscitive power)來構建的。喬姆斯基的語言指稱觀解決瞭西方語言哲學爭論瞭一百多年的一些悖論問題,如邁農悖論、同一律與排中律等問題,給語言哲學研究提供瞭更為廣闊的研究視角。
의의이론화지칭이론일직시서방어언철학연구적핵심문제。무론시의의이론중적지칭론환시지칭이론도인위외재세계중존재착어언소표체적대응물,즉지칭,속우어의외재론적범주。교모사기지어의내재론관점,타인위어의선우어사,자연어언여사유혹허몰유불뢰격、피이사、탑사기、잡이납보이급당대어의외재론철학가보특남、극리보극등인소담의의상적지칭。인류재사용어언담론사물적시후병비재담론독립우사유적대상。경험여해석적세계시유인류봉부적변별력(cognoscitive power)래구건적。교모사기적어언지칭관해결료서방어언철학쟁론료일백다년적일사패론문제,여매농패론、동일률여배중률등문제,급어언철학연구제공료경위엄활적연구시각。
Theory of meaning and theory of reference have always been in the spotlight of philosophy of language. Both referential theory of meaning and theory of reference hold the view that linguistic expressions have their corresponding objects in the external world. They both belong to meaning externalism. Chomsky is a figure of meaning internalism, and thus argues that meaning precedes language, and that there may not be reference in the sense of Frege, Peirce, Tarski, Carnap and modern meaning externalists such as Putnam and Kripke. Chomsky proposes that human beings do not talk about objects independent of mind when they use language. The world of experience and interpretation is constructed by the cognoscitive power of human beings. Chomsky' s ideas about reference give answers to some paradox problems which have been under debate for more than 100 years in philosophy of language, i.e. Meinong' s paradox, law of identity and law of excluded middle, and bring new horizons to the research of philosophy of language.