CAJ | 학술논문

本实验采用固定速的移动窗口范式和意义适合性判断任务，考察场依存、场独立个体抑制句子中歧义词不适当意义的机制以及歧义词歧义消解的进程。结果表明：不同认知方式个体在抑制句子中歧义词不适当意义的时间进程上存在差异，与场依存者相比，场独立者能够较早地抑制歧义的干扰；同时，本研究证明歧义词的多个意义首先激活，然后与语境不一致的意义得到抑制，研究结果支持词汇歧义消解的多重通达模型。
본실험채용고정속적이동창구범식화의의괄합성판단임무，고찰장의존、장독립개체억제구자중기의사불괄당의의적궤제이급기의사기의소해적진정。결과표명：불동인지방식개체재억제구자중기의사불괄당의의적시간진정상존재차이，여장의존자상비，장독립자능구교조지억제기의적간우；동시，본연구증명기의사적다개의의수선격활，연후여어경불일치적의의득도억제，연구결과지지사회기의소해적다중통체모형。
The aim of this experiment is to explore the different mechanism between individuals with field independence and those with field dependence in inhibiting the inappropriate meaning of ambiguous words and the unambiguous mechanism of ambiguous words. The fixed design is a 2 （cognitive styles： field dependence, field independence） × 2 （ISI： 150ms, 800ms） × 2 （sentence type： ambiguous sentence, unambiguous sentence ） design, with cognitive styles and sentence types as between - subjects variables, and ISI being a within - subjects variable. The force - paced moving windows paradigm, and semantic congruity judging tasks were em- ployed. The results showed that field independence inhibited the inappropriate meanings of ambiguous words earlier than field dependence. Meanwhile, the results indicated that the multiple meanings of ambiguous words are activated firstly, then the meaning inconsistent with context is inhibited, which supports the multiple access model.