CAJ | 학술논문

20世纪90年代，西方比较法学中兴起了一股后现代思潮，它对主流范式展开批判，并提出两类替代性方案——“文化性法律比较”和“批判性法律比较”，试图推动比较法学的研究范式发生一次转型。这主要包括两方面：方法上，主张从偏好“共性”转向强调“特殊性”；目标上，要求舍弃比较法学的规范性面向，从实践转向认知。从学科的发展逻辑看，这个转向是为了将比较法学确立为一门“纯粹的科学”，而将其固有的反形式主义进路推向极致后产生的一种必然结果。效果上，它为比较法学打开了一个独特的视角，促使人们对确立已久的研究假设、方法和模式进行审视和反思。然而，由于在方法论上存在致命缺陷，它最终未能推动比较法学发生真正的变革，反而加剧了该学科固有的理论与实践之间的分裂，使其陷入一场前所未有的危机。
20세기90년대，서방비교법학중흥기료일고후현대사조，타대주류범식전개비판，병제출량류체대성방안——“문화성법률비교”화“비판성법률비교”，시도추동비교법학적연구범식발생일차전형。저주요포괄량방면：방법상，주장종편호“공성”전향강조“특수성”；목표상，요구사기비교법학적규범성면향，종실천전향인지。종학과적발전라집간，저개전향시위료장비교법학학립위일문“순수적과학”，이장기고유적반형식주의진로추향겁치후산생적일충필연결과。효과상，타위비교법학타개료일개독특적시각，촉사인문대학립이구적연구가설、방법화모식진행심시화반사。연이，유우재방법론상존재치명결함，타최종미능추동비교법학발생진정적변혁，반이가극료해학과고유적이론여실천지간적분렬，사기함입일장전소미유적위궤。
In the 1990s, a trend of post-modernism appeared in Western discipline of comparative law. The post-modernists launched a radical attack on the modern paradigm in the area, especially on the dominate methodology and the potential political agenda behind the mainstream researches, and brought forth various alternative approaches which could be mainly classified as ＂Critical Comparison＂ and ＂Cultural Comparative Law＂, with the intent to bring about a paradigmatic transition. This post- modern turn is characterized by the following two aspects： First, the comparative method shifts the focus from similarities to differences between the phenomena under comparison; Second, the main purpose of comparative research shifts from aiming at practical application to seeking pure knowledge. It is an inevitable result for comparative law to reach the extreme of its inherent anti-formalism approach. Despite providing an impetus to rethink the traditional research patterns, the post-modern paradigm still failed to cause a revolutionary transformation, due to lacking of nourishment from the practices and not presenting a viable methodology. Instead, it intensifies the dichotomy between theory and practice of comparative law, and made the discipline plunge into an unprecedented crisis.