法学研究
法學研究
법학연구
Cass Journal of Law
2013年
2期
38~59
,共null页
案例指导制度 指导性案例 法律推理 同案判断方法 同判形成规则
案例指導製度 指導性案例 法律推理 同案判斷方法 同判形成規則
안례지도제도 지도성안례 법률추리 동안판단방법 동판형성규칙
case guidance system, guiding case, legal reasoning, method of judging the similarcase, rule of forming the similar judgment
与制定法传统下的法律推理不同,案例指导制度下的法律推理由法律规则、指导性案例、案件事实以及判决结论四个要素构成。在这种思维模式中,由于对待决案件与指导性案例作出是否同案的判断以及如何形成同判是整个法律推理的论证重点,判定两者是否属于相同案件以及如何作出相同判决的方法自然成为这种法律推理的核心方法。案例指导制度下法律推理的规则主要包括:基本参照规则、实现同案同判的认识规则、断定同案的判断规则、形成同判的约束规则、回归规则以及指导性案例选编的编写规则。上述推理形式和推理规则的系统作用是案例指导制度下法律推理得以正确进行的基础和保障。
與製定法傳統下的法律推理不同,案例指導製度下的法律推理由法律規則、指導性案例、案件事實以及判決結論四箇要素構成。在這種思維模式中,由于對待決案件與指導性案例作齣是否同案的判斷以及如何形成同判是整箇法律推理的論證重點,判定兩者是否屬于相同案件以及如何作齣相同判決的方法自然成為這種法律推理的覈心方法。案例指導製度下法律推理的規則主要包括:基本參照規則、實現同案同判的認識規則、斷定同案的判斷規則、形成同判的約束規則、迴歸規則以及指導性案例選編的編寫規則。上述推理形式和推理規則的繫統作用是案例指導製度下法律推理得以正確進行的基礎和保障。
여제정법전통하적법률추리불동,안례지도제도하적법률추이유법률규칙、지도성안례、안건사실이급판결결론사개요소구성。재저충사유모식중,유우대대결안건여지도성안례작출시부동안적판단이급여하형성동판시정개법률추리적론증중점,판정량자시부속우상동안건이급여하작출상동판결적방법자연성위저충법률추리적핵심방법。안례지도제도하법률추리적규칙주요포괄:기본삼조규칙、실현동안동판적인식규칙、단정동안적판단규칙、형성동판적약속규칙、회귀규칙이급지도성안례선편적편사규칙。상술추리형식화추리규칙적계통작용시안례지도제도하법률추리득이정학진행적기출화보장。
The legal reasoning of the case guidance system is the effective way to treat the similar case equally. It not only reflects the particular form of judging thought in the case guidance system, but al- so takes the way of deciding the similar case as the most important method of legal reasoning. Differ- ent from the model of the traditional legal reasoning, the legal reasoning of the case guidance system consists of four parts, that is, the legal rule, the guiding case, the legal fact and the conclusion of judgment. In this model, whether the pending case is similar to the guiding case and how to make a similar judgment to the similar case are the main points to be demonstrated, thus the method to decide the similar case and to make the similar judgment is the key point in the legal argument. Rules of legal reasoning of the case guidance system should be established to guarantee that the similar case get the similar judgment, which include the foundational referential rule, the epistemo- logical rule to realize "similar case, similar judgment", the rule to decide whether the pending case is similar to the guiding cases, the binding rule to form the similar judgment, the regression rule, and the editorial rule of the guiding cases. As a matter of course, without such a theory of legal reasoning, the operation of the case guidance system is impossible. The system function of the above forms and rules of reasoning is the foundation and ance system. safeguard of the correct legal reasoning under the case guid-ance system.