财经研究
財經研究
재경연구
The Study of Finance and Economics
2013年
4期
57~67
,共null页
绿色经济效率 异质性生产技术 共同前沿 共同技术率 方向性距离函数
綠色經濟效率 異質性生產技術 共同前沿 共同技術率 方嚮性距離函數
록색경제효솔 이질성생산기술 공동전연 공동기술솔 방향성거리함수
green economic efficiency; heterogeneous production tech-nology; recta-frontier; meta-technology ratio; directional distance function
文章充分考虑到中国不同省份、区域绿色生产技术的异质性,运用2000—2009年省际面板数据,基于非参数共同前沿理论和方向性距离函数对中国绿色经济效率进行测算;同时,采用“共同技术率”衡量三大区域绿色生产技术与全国潜在最优水平之间的差距,并从“生产技术”和“管理”两个维度将共同前沿下不同区域各省份的绿色经济无效率分解为“技术差距无效率”与“管理无效率”,以剖析效率缺失的根源。研究表明:我国绿色经济效率水平严重偏低,仅为0.3411,距离全国最优绿色生产前沿存在65.89%的改进空间;三大区域的绿色生产技术存在显著差异,东部地区实现了全国潜在最优绿色生产技术的98%以上,而中西部地区则仅实现了11.38%和21.34%,改进潜力巨大;东部地区的绿色经济无效率主要来源于管理方面,而中西部地区则严重受制于落后的绿色生产技术。
文章充分攷慮到中國不同省份、區域綠色生產技術的異質性,運用2000—2009年省際麵闆數據,基于非參數共同前沿理論和方嚮性距離函數對中國綠色經濟效率進行測算;同時,採用“共同技術率”衡量三大區域綠色生產技術與全國潛在最優水平之間的差距,併從“生產技術”和“管理”兩箇維度將共同前沿下不同區域各省份的綠色經濟無效率分解為“技術差距無效率”與“管理無效率”,以剖析效率缺失的根源。研究錶明:我國綠色經濟效率水平嚴重偏低,僅為0.3411,距離全國最優綠色生產前沿存在65.89%的改進空間;三大區域的綠色生產技術存在顯著差異,東部地區實現瞭全國潛在最優綠色生產技術的98%以上,而中西部地區則僅實現瞭11.38%和21.34%,改進潛力巨大;東部地區的綠色經濟無效率主要來源于管理方麵,而中西部地區則嚴重受製于落後的綠色生產技術。
문장충분고필도중국불동성빈、구역록색생산기술적이질성,운용2000—2009년성제면판수거,기우비삼수공동전연이론화방향성거리함수대중국록색경제효솔진행측산;동시,채용“공동기술솔”형량삼대구역록색생산기술여전국잠재최우수평지간적차거,병종“생산기술”화“관리”량개유도장공동전연하불동구역각성빈적록색경제무효솔분해위“기술차거무효솔”여“관리무효솔”,이부석효솔결실적근원。연구표명:아국록색경제효솔수평엄중편저,부위0.3411,거리전국최우록색생산전연존재65.89%적개진공간;삼대구역적록색생산기술존재현저차이,동부지구실현료전국잠재최우록색생산기술적98%이상,이중서부지구칙부실현료11.38%화21.34%,개진잠력거대;동부지구적록색경제무효솔주요래원우관리방면,이중서부지구칙엄중수제우락후적록색생산기술。
Taking full account of heterogeneous green production tech- nology in China's provinces and regions, this paper employs nonparametric meta-frontier theory and directional distance function to measure Chinese green economic efficiency based on the provincial panel data from 2000 to 2009. Then it uses meta-technology ratios to reflect the gap between the green production technology of three major regions and the potential optimal level of the whole country. Then in order to reveal the source of efficiency loss,it decomposes provincial green economic inefficiency under meta-fron- tier in different regions into technology gap inefficiency and managerial inef- ficiency. The results are as follows, firstly,China~s overall green economic efficiency is seriously low, 0. 3411, and has 65.89~ room for improvement compared to the optimal green production frontier of the whole country~ sec- ondly, the green production technology in three main regions differ widely, namely the East region accomplishes over 98% of the potential optimal green production technology of the whole country and the Central and West re- gions only achieve 11.38% and 21.34% respectively,leading to big room for improvement thirdly, green economic inefficiency in the East region are mainly due to management and green economic inefficiency in the Central and West regions is attributed to backward green production technology.