法律科学:西北政法学院学报
法律科學:西北政法學院學報
법률과학:서북정법학원학보
Science of Law
2013年
2期
192~200
,共null页
奥村正雄 王昭武 付玉明
奧村正雄 王昭武 付玉明
오촌정웅 왕소무 부옥명
实行行为 定型说 事前判断说 事后判断说
實行行為 定型說 事前判斷說 事後判斷說
실행행위 정형설 사전판단설 사후판단설
the perpetrating act; forming theory; pre - crime judgment theory; after - crime judgment theory
实行行为的概念,作为主张要成立犯罪,首先必须存在该当于特定构成要件之行为的理论,一直以来支配着日本的犯罪论。实行行为,除了作为结果犯中的因果关系的起点行为,被定位于构成要件要素之外,在未遂犯论以及正犯、共犯论中亦发挥着重要作用。然而,近年,实行行为概念受到质疑,甚至有学说倡导实行行为不要说,主张构建不包括实行行为概念的犯罪论。该学说批判,此前的实行行为概念将实行行为本身化为"黑匣子",是在并未明示实质性价值判断的情形下直接推导出结论,并且,在此概念之下,对于因果关系论、未遂犯论、正犯与共犯论的问题浑然一体地进行研究,有碍于解决这些问题所必需进行的分析性探讨。本文通过回应该批判观点所提出的问题,再次验证实行行为概念的存在意义,进而主张该概念的重要性与必要性。
實行行為的概唸,作為主張要成立犯罪,首先必鬚存在該噹于特定構成要件之行為的理論,一直以來支配著日本的犯罪論。實行行為,除瞭作為結果犯中的因果關繫的起點行為,被定位于構成要件要素之外,在未遂犯論以及正犯、共犯論中亦髮揮著重要作用。然而,近年,實行行為概唸受到質疑,甚至有學說倡導實行行為不要說,主張構建不包括實行行為概唸的犯罪論。該學說批判,此前的實行行為概唸將實行行為本身化為"黑匣子",是在併未明示實質性價值判斷的情形下直接推導齣結論,併且,在此概唸之下,對于因果關繫論、未遂犯論、正犯與共犯論的問題渾然一體地進行研究,有礙于解決這些問題所必需進行的分析性探討。本文通過迴應該批判觀點所提齣的問題,再次驗證實行行為概唸的存在意義,進而主張該概唸的重要性與必要性。
실행행위적개념,작위주장요성립범죄,수선필수존재해당우특정구성요건지행위적이론,일직이래지배착일본적범죄론。실행행위,제료작위결과범중적인과관계적기점행위,피정위우구성요건요소지외,재미수범론이급정범、공범론중역발휘착중요작용。연이,근년,실행행위개념수도질의,심지유학설창도실행행위불요설,주장구건불포괄실행행위개념적범죄론。해학설비판,차전적실행행위개념장실행행위본신화위"흑갑자",시재병미명시실질성개치판단적정형하직접추도출결론,병차,재차개념지하,대우인과관계론、미수범론、정범여공범론적문제혼연일체지진행연구,유애우해결저사문제소필수진행적분석성탐토。본문통과회응해비판관점소제출적문제,재차험증실행행위개념적존재의의,진이주장해개념적중요성여필요성。
The concept of perpetrating act always dominates the Japanese crime theory, which suggests that the exist- ence of such behavior consisted of constitutive requirements is the premise for the establishment of crime. Perpetrating act is not only defined as a constitutive element and the starting behavior of consequential offense's causal relationship, but also plays a significant role in the attempted offense theory, the principal offender theory and the joint offense theory. However, in recent years, the concept of perpetrating act has been questioned. Even some theories support the rid of the perpetrating act theory, which argue for the establishment of a new crime theory without this concept. This theory criticizes that the pre- vious concept of perpetrating act treated itself as a black box, which deduces the conclusion directly in the case of without expressing the substantive value judgment. Furthermore, in line with the concept, the integrated study of the causality, at- tempted offense, principal offender and joint offense theory blocks the necessarily analytic exploration of solving these prob- lems. This paper validates the significance of the existence of perpetrating act again by responding to the questions which are proposed by the Critical opinions and then advocates the importance and necessity of the concept.