经济社会体制比较
經濟社會體製比較
경제사회체제비교
Comparative Economic and Social Systems
2013年
2期
110~121
,共null页
英国警察 聚众活动 警察法制 公民权利
英國警察 聚衆活動 警察法製 公民權利
영국경찰 취음활동 경찰법제 공민권리
British Police; Mass Activities; Police Law; Civil Rights
英美模式与欧陆模式警察机制中的治安执法所依据的法律制度与实践已逐渐呈融合之势,某些核心价值和执法程序已成为各方不可或缺的必然之选。因更为适合当今法治的预期与实效,英国警制的一些重要核心价值得到了两种模式的共同认可。作为普通法国家,英国处置聚众活动的警察制度包含了制定法和判例以及警察机制的执法裁量;加之立法、行政和司法监督机制共同构成了警察处置聚众活动的治安权行使过程。在英国特有的公法传统影响下,警察处置聚众活动的治安权法律体系和执法程序围绕其特有的原则和价值核心呈现波动型变化;警察执法中体现出的比例原则和公法契约思想已得到了广泛认可和应用,这不仅符合宪政主义的法理,同时也符合行政执法的效能要求。
英美模式與歐陸模式警察機製中的治安執法所依據的法律製度與實踐已逐漸呈融閤之勢,某些覈心價值和執法程序已成為各方不可或缺的必然之選。因更為適閤噹今法治的預期與實效,英國警製的一些重要覈心價值得到瞭兩種模式的共同認可。作為普通法國傢,英國處置聚衆活動的警察製度包含瞭製定法和判例以及警察機製的執法裁量;加之立法、行政和司法鑑督機製共同構成瞭警察處置聚衆活動的治安權行使過程。在英國特有的公法傳統影響下,警察處置聚衆活動的治安權法律體繫和執法程序圍繞其特有的原則和價值覈心呈現波動型變化;警察執法中體現齣的比例原則和公法契約思想已得到瞭廣汎認可和應用,這不僅符閤憲政主義的法理,同時也符閤行政執法的效能要求。
영미모식여구륙모식경찰궤제중적치안집법소의거적법률제도여실천이축점정융합지세,모사핵심개치화집법정서이성위각방불가혹결적필연지선。인경위괄합당금법치적예기여실효,영국경제적일사중요핵심개치득도료량충모식적공동인가。작위보통법국가,영국처치취음활동적경찰제도포함료제정법화판례이급경찰궤제적집법재량;가지입법、행정화사법감독궤제공동구성료경찰처치취음활동적치안권행사과정。재영국특유적공법전통영향하,경찰처치취음활동적치안권법률체계화집법정서위요기특유적원칙화개치핵심정현파동형변화;경찰집법중체현출적비례원칙화공법계약사상이득도료엄범인가화응용,저불부부합헌정주의적법리,동시야부합행정집법적효능요구。
The British police legal system (Anglo- American police system) and the European continental police legal system and their respective enforcement practices regarding policing protests and other mass activities are becoming ever - more similar, and some core values and law enforcement procedures of the British police legal system have become essential elements in both police legal systems. The UK is a common law country, and its legal system for policing mass activities contains statute laws, case laws and discretionary police practices, as well the laws pertaining to systems of legislative, administrative and judicial powers. The forming of the UK's legal system in this respect is a fluctuating dynamic process around statute laws and law principles established under the influence of the UK's special public law traditions. The principle of proportionality and law of contract theory have been widely recognized, and they not only meet the demand of juridical logic of constitutionality, but also the demand of administrative law enforcement efficiency.