南京师大学报:社会科学版
南京師大學報:社會科學版
남경사대학보:사회과학판
Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition)
2013年
2期
30~37
,共null页
城市公共治理 社会复合主体 平等的关系结构 规范的制度结构
城市公共治理 社會複閤主體 平等的關繫結構 規範的製度結構
성시공공치리 사회복합주체 평등적관계결구 규범적제도결구
urban public governance; social composite subject; equal relational structure; normative institutional structure
当今,城市公共事务治理变得异常复杂,以往城市管理部门许多治理经验已难以适应新的治理情境,于是创新城市治理模式成为必然。在这样背景下,杭州市试图运用社会复合主体模式突破城市治理困局。对于社会复合主体治理创新这一新生事物,人们的认知大多聚焦在理念和价值功能的建构上,而很少关注其隐含的制度结构和关系结构。事实上,通过多案例的分析,我们发现社会复合主体的"共治"结构属性,即平等的关系结构和规范制度结构;而社会复合主体的成功运行也表明"共治"结构的前提是政府前瞻性的理念创新和民主开放的价值取向,而非社会资本和公共精神的充裕程度。
噹今,城市公共事務治理變得異常複雜,以往城市管理部門許多治理經驗已難以適應新的治理情境,于是創新城市治理模式成為必然。在這樣揹景下,杭州市試圖運用社會複閤主體模式突破城市治理睏跼。對于社會複閤主體治理創新這一新生事物,人們的認知大多聚焦在理唸和價值功能的建構上,而很少關註其隱含的製度結構和關繫結構。事實上,通過多案例的分析,我們髮現社會複閤主體的"共治"結構屬性,即平等的關繫結構和規範製度結構;而社會複閤主體的成功運行也錶明"共治"結構的前提是政府前瞻性的理唸創新和民主開放的價值取嚮,而非社會資本和公共精神的充裕程度。
당금,성시공공사무치리변득이상복잡,이왕성시관리부문허다치리경험이난이괄응신적치리정경,우시창신성시치리모식성위필연。재저양배경하,항주시시도운용사회복합주체모식돌파성시치리곤국。대우사회복합주체치리창신저일신생사물,인문적인지대다취초재이념화개치공능적건구상,이흔소관주기은함적제도결구화관계결구。사실상,통과다안례적분석,아문발현사회복합주체적"공치"결구속성,즉평등적관계결구화규범제도결구;이사회복합주체적성공운행야표명"공치"결구적전제시정부전첨성적이념창신화민주개방적개치취향,이비사회자본화공공정신적충유정도。
Nowadays,the management of urban public affairs becomes so complex that much of the experience acquired by the government in the past is now facing difficulties in the new situation.Thus urban governance innovation becomes a necessity.In such a context,the City of Hangzhou tries to resolve the dilemma by implementing the mode of social composite subject.However,people focus mainly on the construction of the conception and value of this totally new policy and pay little attention to its underlying institutional structure and relational structure.In fact,through the analysis of many cases,we have found that the social composite subject is characterized by its co-governance structural properties,i.e.equal relational structure and normative institutional structure.The successful operation of the social composite subject shows that co-governance is determined by the fact that the government embraces a forward-looking concept of innovation and an open democratic value orientation,rather than by the adequacy of social capital and the public spirit.