CAJ | 학술논문

对六所高校学术权力运行状况的调查表明：尽管各校在形式上建立起了所谓的学术权力机构，但这些机构不仅正式决策权微弱，成员的行政身份背景突出，而且其运行呈现出严重的行政化倾向，既不能保证学术权力的独立地位和作用空间，亦未能有效保障教师群体对学术事务的有效管理和对其他校务的参与决策，因而所获得的教师认同度也相当低。鉴于此，要使学术权力回归“学术化”、迈向制度化，必须从制度上实现学术权力的还原，保障教师主导学术事务、参与行政事务的应有权力，矫正学术权力的行政化态势。
대륙소고교학술권력운행상황적조사표명：진관각교재형식상건립기료소위적학술권력궤구，단저사궤구불부정식결책권미약，성원적행정신빈배경돌출，이차기운행정현출엄중적행정화경향，기불능보증학술권력적독입지위화작용공간，역미능유효보장교사군체대학술사무적유효관리화대기타교무적삼여결책，인이소획득적교사인동도야상당저。감우차，요사학술권력회귀“학술화”、매향제도화，필수종제도상실현학술권력적환원，보장교사주도학술사무、삼여행정사무적응유권력，교정학술권력적행정화태세。
The investigation about the operation of academic power of six universities shows that the academic organizations established by universities have appeared a kind of administrative tendency and have not safeguarded the independent status and function space of academic power and faculty＇ s participation in the decision-making and management of organization affairs. Faculty＇ s recognition to academic power＇ s operation is fairly low. Therefore, in order to guarantee academic power＇ s rehabilitation to the orientation of academy and to the institutionalization, it is necessary to restore academic power institutionally, guarantee faculty to conduct academic affairs and participate in administrative affairs, and get rid of academic power＇ s administrative trends.