CAJ | 학술논문

对于中国边疆学的建立与发展来说，拉铁摩尔的中国边疆研究都是无法一步跨过去的。既有的对拉铁摩尔的研究，或囿于各自理路，或碍于翻译问题，在其核心思想的把握上，都有某种难通的困境。笔者查对他的相关英文原著，集中解读其以“内边疆”（InnerFrontier）、“外边疆”（outerFron—tier）为核心概念建立起来的边疆概念体系，一探其打通古今、实现中西概念对接的堂奥。我以为，他的上述研究框架可以用“双边疆”（doublefrontiers）范式来命名。拉铁摩尔“双边疆”范式的生命力在于它的预见性，但也并不是没有僵化的地方，表现就是困于“蒙古”不“属于”“中国”的成见，完全漠视了喀尔喀蒙古对于清朝经略西北而言的“过渡地带”的地位，只是把它作为“外边疆”。拉铁摩尔的“双边疆”范式可以改造成为中国边疆学建构的基本认识框架。
대우중국변강학적건립여발전래설，랍철마이적중국변강연구도시무법일보과과거적。기유적대랍철마이적연구，혹유우각자리로，혹애우번역문제，재기핵심사상적파악상，도유모충난통적곤경。필자사대타적상관영문원저，집중해독기이“내변강”（InnerFrontier）、“외변강”（outerFron—tier）위핵심개념건립기래적변강개념체계，일탐기타통고금、실현중서개념대접적당오。아이위，타적상술연구광가가이용“쌍변강”（doublefrontiers）범식래명명。랍철마이“쌍변강”범식적생명력재우타적예견성，단야병불시몰유강화적지방，표현취시곤우“몽고”불“속우”“중국”적성견，완전막시료객이객몽고대우청조경략서북이언적“과도지대”적지위，지시파타작위“외변강”。랍철마이적“쌍변강”범식가이개조성위중국변강학건구적기본인식광가。
Owen Lattimore＇s study on China＇s borderlands is inseparable to the establishment and development of China＇s borderlands studies. The previous studies on Lattimore in China have some weaknesses due to limitations in vision or translation problems. Based on the reading of his English works, the author of this paper has focused on his concept of double frontiers, that is, inner frontier and outer frontier whose strong point is its predictability and whose weakness is his bias that excludes ＂Mongolia＂ from the territory of China due to his ignorance of Khalkha-Mongolia as the transitional region of northwest China. Lattimore＇s concept of double frontiers can shed some light on the estab- lishment of China＇s borderlands studies.