经济管理
經濟管理
경제관리
Economic Management Journal(EMJ)
2013年
4期
183~194
,共null页
差序式领导 差序格局 文化适应 正义观 上下级关系
差序式領導 差序格跼 文化適應 正義觀 上下級關繫
차서식령도 차서격국 문화괄응 정의관 상하급관계
Chaxu leadership ; Chaxugeju ; cultural adaptability; justice ; superior-subordinate relationship
差序式领导是否是一种有效的领导方式?本文尝试从文化适应性上对这一问题进行回应。首先分析了差序式领导有效性的文化预设,并详细讨论了差序式领导与中国人正义观以及中国人的“忍与时”的观念之间的关系,以从文化上厘清差序式领导有效运行的内在逻辑。在此基础上,本文分别对差序式领导与家长式领导、“领导一成员”交换理论进行比较与整合分析,以更深刻理解差序式领导的理论内涵。本研究发现,差序式领导的风格符合中国文化的认知,与其他领导理论相比,差序式领导理论更具备本土契合性。本文对于建构中国本土领导理论提供了重要的借鉴和有益的启示。
差序式領導是否是一種有效的領導方式?本文嘗試從文化適應性上對這一問題進行迴應。首先分析瞭差序式領導有效性的文化預設,併詳細討論瞭差序式領導與中國人正義觀以及中國人的“忍與時”的觀唸之間的關繫,以從文化上釐清差序式領導有效運行的內在邏輯。在此基礎上,本文分彆對差序式領導與傢長式領導、“領導一成員”交換理論進行比較與整閤分析,以更深刻理解差序式領導的理論內涵。本研究髮現,差序式領導的風格符閤中國文化的認知,與其他領導理論相比,差序式領導理論更具備本土契閤性。本文對于建構中國本土領導理論提供瞭重要的藉鑒和有益的啟示。
차서식령도시부시일충유효적령도방식?본문상시종문화괄응성상대저일문제진행회응。수선분석료차서식령도유효성적문화예설,병상세토론료차서식령도여중국인정의관이급중국인적“인여시”적관념지간적관계,이종문화상전청차서식령도유효운행적내재라집。재차기출상,본문분별대차서식령도여가장식령도、“령도일성원”교환이론진행비교여정합분석,이경심각리해차서식령도적이론내함。본연구발현,차서식령도적풍격부합중국문화적인지,여기타령도이론상비,차서식령도이론경구비본토계합성。본문대우건구중국본토령도이론제공료중요적차감화유익적계시。
The notion "Chaxugeju" as an important concept in the field of sociology, although put forward by Fei Xiao-Tong for more than half a century, has shown more and more powerful explanation to the Chinese and the Chinese society. As a kind of thinking and cognitive mode," Chaxugeju" has a strong impact on the Chinese enter- prise' s operation and leadership model inevitably, which is almost a blind spot for the academia of China Mainland yet. Therefore, the theory of Chaxu leadership, advanced by Cheng Bor-Shiuan from the China Taiwan region is the echo of this need. The theory holds that the Chinese leaders always treat subordinates differently depending on whether the subordinates is a Zijren (similar to the inroup) or Wairen (similar to the out-group) .
In the transitional society both tradition and modernity coexisted, does the Chaxu leadership is a kind of effective leadership style ? At present some scholars have begun to study the Chaxu leadership, which is verified the effectiveness of Chaxu leadership. However, there were few research concerned about why the Chaxu leadership was effective ,which seemingly was contrary to the organizational justice theory from the western culture. We try to re- spond to this issue from the perspective of cultural adaptability. This paper firstly analyzed the cultural presupposi- tion of Chaxu leadership effectiveness, explored the basic mechanism of the effective operation of Chaxu leadership in the organizations from the maintenance of the Confucian principle "Qinqin" and "Zunzun". Then the relationship between Chaxu leadership and the Chinese conception of justice was discussed. We argue the Chinese conception of justice is essentially a norm for regulating the human relationships, rather than the rule of reason purely guiding the profit distribution. Furthermore, we discussed the relationship among employee category, differential treatment and organizational justice. We hold that the leaders should give more attention to the procedural justice and interactional justice when classifying the employees, and attach more importance to the distributive justice and interactional jus- tice when treating the employees differently. In the meantime, we still probed the effect of the perception of Chinese "endurance" and "timing" on the employees, and pointed out the Wairen of leaders realized psychological self-motivation through the process of "Ren" and the expectation of "Shi", and thus ascended individual performance.
On that basis, this paper discussed the relationship between Chaxu leadership and Paternalistic leadership, the theory of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX)respectively, and achieved the dialogue and integration between Eastern and Western leadership theory. Specifically speaking,we think the type of Chaxu leadership covers the connotative meaning of paternalistic leadership with authoritarian leadership, benevolent leadership and moral leadership, and may be more fit the Chinese indigenous essence of leadership. We further argue leaders with the type of Chaxu lead- ership may exert more benevolent leadership and less authoritarian leadership to the Zijiren of employees, and more authoritarian leadership and less benevolent leadership to the Wairen of employees. In addition, the Chaxu leadership and LMX, based on Chinese society and Western society respectively, are two different leadership theory, and have large differences both in the cultural foundation and theoretical connotation. Thus we hold that LMX theory might not be sufficient to precisely describe and fully explain the superior-subordinate relationship in Chinese con- text, and relatively speaking, the Chaxu leadership is more fit the Chinese situation. All in all, we insist that the style of Chaxu leadership in accordance with Chinese cultural cognition, should be still can play its positive role in the current environment. This paper provides an important reference and beneficial enlightenment to the construction of Chinese indigenous leadership theory.