财贸研究
財貿研究
재무연구
Finance and Trade Research
2013年
2期
146~156
,共null页
股权激励 代理成本 投资效率 中介效应
股權激勵 代理成本 投資效率 中介效應
고권격려 대리성본 투자효솔 중개효응
equity incentive ; agency costs ; investment efficiency ; mediation effect
将股权激励、所有权结构、代理成本与投资效率纳入一个统一的分析框架,使用产权属性作为调节变量,代理成本作为中介变量,实证检验股权激励是否影响投资效率,以及股权激励、所有权结构、代理成本与投资效率之间的关系。结果表明:股权激励能够抑制上市公司的非效率投资,代理成本的中介效应显著,但所占比重很小,非国有企业的抑制作用大于国有企业,非国有企业的中介传导机制畅通;国有企业“期权激励”方式能够显著抑制非效率投资,非国有企业的非效率投资通过实施“股票激励”方式能够得到显著抑制;实施股权激励计划能够显著抑制上市公司的投资不足,非国有企业的抑制作用大于国有企业,非国有企业的代理成本中介效应机制畅通,国有上市公司的代理成本中介效应不显著。
將股權激勵、所有權結構、代理成本與投資效率納入一箇統一的分析框架,使用產權屬性作為調節變量,代理成本作為中介變量,實證檢驗股權激勵是否影響投資效率,以及股權激勵、所有權結構、代理成本與投資效率之間的關繫。結果錶明:股權激勵能夠抑製上市公司的非效率投資,代理成本的中介效應顯著,但所佔比重很小,非國有企業的抑製作用大于國有企業,非國有企業的中介傳導機製暢通;國有企業“期權激勵”方式能夠顯著抑製非效率投資,非國有企業的非效率投資通過實施“股票激勵”方式能夠得到顯著抑製;實施股權激勵計劃能夠顯著抑製上市公司的投資不足,非國有企業的抑製作用大于國有企業,非國有企業的代理成本中介效應機製暢通,國有上市公司的代理成本中介效應不顯著。
장고권격려、소유권결구、대리성본여투자효솔납입일개통일적분석광가,사용산권속성작위조절변량,대리성본작위중개변량,실증검험고권격려시부영향투자효솔,이급고권격려、소유권결구、대리성본여투자효솔지간적관계。결과표명:고권격려능구억제상시공사적비효솔투자,대리성본적중개효응현저,단소점비중흔소,비국유기업적억제작용대우국유기업,비국유기업적중개전도궤제창통;국유기업“기권격려”방식능구현저억제비효솔투자,비국유기업적비효솔투자통과실시“고표격려”방식능구득도현저억제;실시고권격려계화능구현저억제상시공사적투자불족,비국유기업적억제작용대우국유기업,비국유기업적대리성본중개효응궤제창통,국유상시공사적대리성본중개효응불현저。
This paper empirically tests whether equity incentive affects investment efficiency and relationship among equity incentives, ownership structure, agency costs and investment efficiency by taking these factors into an analytical framework, ownership as a mediation variable, and agency costs as mediating variables. The results show that: equity incentive inhibits inefficient investment of listed companies, media- tion effect of agency costs is significant, but proportion is very small, inhibition effect of non-state-owned enterprises is greater than that of state-owned ones, and mediation transmission mechanism for non-state- owned enterprises works well; "option incentive" approach significantly inhibits non-efficiency investments for state-owned enterprises, while non-efficient investments is significantly inhibited through "equity incentives" approach; implementation of equity incentive plans significantly inhibits under-investment, inhibition effect of non-state-owned enterprises is greater than that of state-owned ones, mediation effect transmission mechanism for non-state-owned enterprises works well, and the mediating effect of agency costs for state- owned companies is not significant.