现代法学
現代法學
현대법학
Modern Law Science
2013年
2期
125~134
,共null页
重复供述 可采性 理论根据 分阶段排除 实践障碍
重複供述 可採性 理論根據 分階段排除 實踐障礙
중복공술 가채성 이론근거 분계단배제 실천장애
successive confession; admissibility; theoretical foundation; staged excluding approach; practical impediments
一次非法取供,是否要对重复供述一排到底?重复供述问题在我国尤为突出,然而,法律和司法解释中并未明确重复供述的可采性。重复供述排除与否取决于先前的非法取供手段对重复供述的实际影响。基于我国实际,应当实行重复供述的分阶段排除方式,即原则上只排除非法取供发生后至确认前在同一诉讼阶段获取的重复供述。为了克服排除重复供述的障碍,应当允许重复取供,理顺公、检、法的关系,减少三机关的同质性。当然,最根本的举措是要建立激励为主的取供机制,调整形式主义的口供运用模式,怯除对非自愿供述的依赖。
一次非法取供,是否要對重複供述一排到底?重複供述問題在我國尤為突齣,然而,法律和司法解釋中併未明確重複供述的可採性。重複供述排除與否取決于先前的非法取供手段對重複供述的實際影響。基于我國實際,應噹實行重複供述的分階段排除方式,即原則上隻排除非法取供髮生後至確認前在同一訴訟階段穫取的重複供述。為瞭剋服排除重複供述的障礙,應噹允許重複取供,理順公、檢、法的關繫,減少三機關的同質性。噹然,最根本的舉措是要建立激勵為主的取供機製,調整形式主義的口供運用模式,怯除對非自願供述的依賴。
일차비법취공,시부요대중복공술일배도저?중복공술문제재아국우위돌출,연이,법률화사법해석중병미명학중복공술적가채성。중복공술배제여부취결우선전적비법취공수단대중복공술적실제영향。기우아국실제,응당실행중복공술적분계단배제방식,즉원칙상지배제비법취공발생후지학인전재동일소송계단획취적중복공술。위료극복배제중복공술적장애,응당윤허중복취공,리순공、검、법적관계,감소삼궤관적동질성。당연,최근본적거조시요건립격려위주적취공궤제,조정형식주의적구공운용모식,겁제대비자원공술적의뢰。
If a first confession is not shown to be voluntary,should the latter ones be all excluded? The problem of successive confessions seems especially prominent in China,but in laws or judicial interpretations no explicit provisions can be found concerning a second or third confession's admissibility.Whether a second or third confession is excluded is determined by how the illegal means used to extort the former confession exerted a substantial impact upon the latter ones.In practice,a staged exclusion approach should be adopted,i.e.,only a successive confession made in the period from an illegal confession's making to its confirmation shall be excluded.To get over the barrier of exclusion of repeated confessions,the relationship of the police,the prosecution and the court should be well handled so as have their functions clearly distinguished.Of course,the most important thing is to establish a motivation oriented suspect interrogation mechanism,correct formalistic testimony operational way,and eradicate dependency upon involuntary confessions.