体育科学
體育科學
체육과학
China Sport Science
2013年
4期
55~62
,共null页
老年人 体质 理论模型 因素 验证性因素分析
老年人 體質 理論模型 因素 驗證性因素分析
노년인 체질 이론모형 인소 험증성인소분석
elderly people ; physical fitness; theoretical model ; factor ; confirmatory factor a- nal ysis
目的:检验体质五因素模型在老年群体中能否得到实证研究的支持,并进行相关的分析探讨,完善体质理论结构的研究。方法:根据理论模型设计包含19个条目的指标体系后对60~79岁老年人进行测试,对样本数据进行验证性因素分析,在此基础上做进一步的数据分析和探讨。结果:在男性和女性中,体质五因素理论模型拟合均欠佳,拟合指数分别为AGFI=0.836、GH=0.770、RSEMA=0.097和AGFI=0.858、GnFI=0.801、RSEMA=0.091,按照模型设计的指标体系实际均包含6个因素,分别可解释总方差的67.7%和64.7%。由此构建的六因素理论模型在男性中AGFI=0.923、GFI=0.892、RSEMA=0.058;在女性中AGFI=0.929、GFI=0.964、RSEMA=0.041,且因子载荷均较整齐,基本都在0.6~0.9之间。结论:在老年组中,体质五因素(形态、机能、素质、适应能力和心理发展水平)模型未得到实证研究支持,根据该模型设计的指标体系实为六因素模型(体成分、心血管、力量、素质、适应能力和心理状态),体质模型中的因素应该是具体的属性或概念,笼统的概念构建的模型很难得到实证数据支持。
目的:檢驗體質五因素模型在老年群體中能否得到實證研究的支持,併進行相關的分析探討,完善體質理論結構的研究。方法:根據理論模型設計包含19箇條目的指標體繫後對60~79歲老年人進行測試,對樣本數據進行驗證性因素分析,在此基礎上做進一步的數據分析和探討。結果:在男性和女性中,體質五因素理論模型擬閤均欠佳,擬閤指數分彆為AGFI=0.836、GH=0.770、RSEMA=0.097和AGFI=0.858、GnFI=0.801、RSEMA=0.091,按照模型設計的指標體繫實際均包含6箇因素,分彆可解釋總方差的67.7%和64.7%。由此構建的六因素理論模型在男性中AGFI=0.923、GFI=0.892、RSEMA=0.058;在女性中AGFI=0.929、GFI=0.964、RSEMA=0.041,且因子載荷均較整齊,基本都在0.6~0.9之間。結論:在老年組中,體質五因素(形態、機能、素質、適應能力和心理髮展水平)模型未得到實證研究支持,根據該模型設計的指標體繫實為六因素模型(體成分、心血管、力量、素質、適應能力和心理狀態),體質模型中的因素應該是具體的屬性或概唸,籠統的概唸構建的模型很難得到實證數據支持。
목적:검험체질오인소모형재노년군체중능부득도실증연구적지지,병진행상관적분석탐토,완선체질이론결구적연구。방법:근거이론모형설계포함19개조목적지표체계후대60~79세노년인진행측시,대양본수거진행험증성인소분석,재차기출상주진일보적수거분석화탐토。결과:재남성화녀성중,체질오인소이론모형의합균흠가,의합지수분별위AGFI=0.836、GH=0.770、RSEMA=0.097화AGFI=0.858、GnFI=0.801、RSEMA=0.091,안조모형설계적지표체계실제균포함6개인소,분별가해석총방차적67.7%화64.7%。유차구건적륙인소이론모형재남성중AGFI=0.923、GFI=0.892、RSEMA=0.058;재녀성중AGFI=0.929、GFI=0.964、RSEMA=0.041,차인자재하균교정제,기본도재0.6~0.9지간。결론:재노년조중,체질오인소(형태、궤능、소질、괄응능력화심리발전수평)모형미득도실증연구지지,근거해모형설계적지표체계실위륙인소모형(체성분、심혈관、역량、소질、괄응능력화심리상태),체질모형중적인소응해시구체적속성혹개념,롱통적개념구건적모형흔난득도실증수거지지。
Objective: In order to improve theoretical structure of physical fitness, this study was to examine whether five-factor's model of physical fitness can be proved by empirical research, and to make analysis on this result. Methods : Based on theoretical model, this study develop test battery containing 19 items to test elderly people aged 60-79, use confirmatory factor analysis to test the data and then make data further analysis and discussion. Results: Regardless of gender, five-factor's model of physical fitness is badly fit, AGFI = 0.836, GFI = 0. 770,RSEMA=0.09 for male and AGFI=0.929,GFI=0.964,RSEMA=0.041 for female. Actual index system designed in accordance with the model contains six factors explained 67.7% (male) and 64.7% (female) of the total variance, which is called for six-factor's model that fit index is AGFI=0.923, GFI=0.892, RSEMA=0.058 in male and AGFI=0.929, GFI=0.964, RSEMA=0.041 in female. Factor loading of six-factor's model in the two groups is basically from 0.6 to 0.9. Conclusion: In the elderly people group, five-factor's theoretical models of physical fitness(growth, physiological functional, physical quality, psychologi- cal state and physical adaptation) don't gain the support of empirical research, which is actually sixfactor' s model ( body composition, cardiovascular, strength, physical quality, psychological state and physical adaptation). The general concept of building the model is difficult to obtain empirical data to support, which need to be replaced by specific properties or concepts.