外语与外语教学
外語與外語教學
외어여외어교학
Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
2013年
2期
31~35
,共null页
陈晓湘 彭丽娜 郭兴荣 张姣 刘星
陳曉湘 彭麗娜 郭興榮 張姣 劉星
진효상 팽려나 곽흥영 장교 류성
聚焦反馈 非聚焦反馈 直接反馈 间接反馈 非真实条件虚拟语气 语言水平
聚焦反饋 非聚焦反饋 直接反饋 間接反饋 非真實條件虛擬語氣 語言水平
취초반궤 비취초반궤 직접반궤 간접반궤 비진실조건허의어기 어언수평
focused feedback; unfocused feedback; direct feed-back; indirect feedback; English subjunctive conditional, profi-ciency level
本文探讨了聚焦和非聚焦反馈是否能提高非英语专业生非真实条件虚拟语气运用的准确性。实验9周,受试96人,根据前测成绩和反馈类型将学习者分为五组:直接聚焦,间接聚焦,直接非聚焦,间接非聚焦和控制组。结果显示:所有实验组的成绩在即时后测和延时后测中都大大超过了控制组,但在即时后测中,聚焦和非聚焦组无明显差异,直接聚焦优于间接聚焦组,直接非聚焦优于间接非聚焦组;在延时后测中,聚焦优于非聚焦组,间接聚焦优于直接聚焦组,间接非聚焦优于直接非聚焦组。此外,语言水平也影响到对虚拟语气习得的反馈效果。实验结果驳斥了Truscott纠错无效反而有害的观点,为反馈有效提供了正面证据。
本文探討瞭聚焦和非聚焦反饋是否能提高非英語專業生非真實條件虛擬語氣運用的準確性。實驗9週,受試96人,根據前測成績和反饋類型將學習者分為五組:直接聚焦,間接聚焦,直接非聚焦,間接非聚焦和控製組。結果顯示:所有實驗組的成績在即時後測和延時後測中都大大超過瞭控製組,但在即時後測中,聚焦和非聚焦組無明顯差異,直接聚焦優于間接聚焦組,直接非聚焦優于間接非聚焦組;在延時後測中,聚焦優于非聚焦組,間接聚焦優于直接聚焦組,間接非聚焦優于直接非聚焦組。此外,語言水平也影響到對虛擬語氣習得的反饋效果。實驗結果駁斥瞭Truscott糾錯無效反而有害的觀點,為反饋有效提供瞭正麵證據。
본문탐토료취초화비취초반궤시부능제고비영어전업생비진실조건허의어기운용적준학성。실험9주,수시96인,근거전측성적화반궤류형장학습자분위오조:직접취초,간접취초,직접비취초,간접비취초화공제조。결과현시:소유실험조적성적재즉시후측화연시후측중도대대초과료공제조,단재즉시후측중,취초화비취초조무명현차이,직접취초우우간접취초조,직접비취초우우간접비취초조;재연시후측중,취초우우비취초조,간접취초우우직접취초조,간접비취초우우직접비취초조。차외,어언수평야영향도대허의어기습득적반궤효과。실험결과박척료Truscott규착무효반이유해적관점,위반궤유효제공료정면증거。
This study was to investigate whether focused and un- focused written corrective feedback helps non-English majors to improve linguistic accuracy in using English subjunctive condi- tional. The experiment lasted 9 weeks, including 96 subjects. According to their scores of the pre-test and the types of feedback, the subjects were divided into the direct focused, indirect fo- cused, direct unfocused, and indirect unfocused groups. The re- suits indicated that all the treatment groups significantly outper- formed the control group. However, in the immediate post-test, there was no significant difference between the focused and un- focused groups, but the direct focused group performed better than the indirect focused one, and the direct unfocused group did better than the indirect unfocused one;in the delayed post-test, the focused group outperformed the unfocused, the indirect fo- cused group did better than the direct focused one, and the indi- rect unfocused group performed better than the direct unfocused one. Moreover, the subjects' linguistic proficiency level worked on the feedback effectiveness on improving linguistic accuracy in using English subjunctive conditional. The findings of the present study ran counter to Truscott' s ( 1996, 1999,2007 ) claim that corrective feedback is not effective, it is even harm- ful, thus presenting further positive evidence in support of the effectiveness of corrective feedback.