CAJ | 학술논문

自20世纪70年代布雷弗曼的《劳动与垄断资本》一书出版以来，劳动过程理论的研究开始呈现出多元化的趋势并渗透到了劳动经济学、工业社会学、组织理论等诸多社会科学领域。很多批判布雷弗曼的学者认为其研究继承了马克思主义传统中忽视主体性的缺陷，于是他们将认同、性别、年龄、种族、公民权、国籍等问题引入了资本主义劳动过程理论，并借用福柯“自我政治”的后现代主义分析范式和话语来强调劳动过程中的“规训”，弱化传统马克思意义上的“剥削”。这波后现代主义思潮引发了劳动过程理论圈内进一步的辩论，从而将马克思主义政治经济学对资本主义生产方式的批判和对阶级分析的强调重新带入了人们的视野。
자20세기70년대포뢰불만적《노동여롱단자본》일서출판이래，노동과정이론적연구개시정현출다원화적추세병삼투도료노동경제학、공업사회학、조직이론등제다사회과학영역。흔다비판포뢰불만적학자인위기연구계승료마극사주의전통중홀시주체성적결함，우시타문장인동、성별、년령、충족、공민권、국적등문제인입료자본주의노동과정이론，병차용복가“자아정치”적후현대주의분석범식화화어래강조노동과정중적“규훈”，약화전통마극사의의상적“박삭”。저파후현대주의사조인발료노동과정이론권내진일보적변론，종이장마극사주의정치경제학대자본주의생산방식적비판화대계급분석적강조중신대입료인문적시야。
Since the publishing of Harry Braverman＇s Labor and Monopoly Capital in the 1970s, there have been diverse approaches, from many social science disciplines, attempting to re- vitalize and reconstruct Labor Process Theory. Some scholars criticized the neglect of subjectivity in the Marxist tradition of Braverman＇s research and started to focus on the subjective elements of labor in the workplace and its resistance. The analytical tools and discourses they have relied up- on,such as Foucault＇s politics of self, led Labor Process Theory into a postmodernist diversion which centers more on discipline than exploitation. This new focus sparked another round of de- bate in Labor Process Theory, which has brought back the Marxist emphasis on capitalist rela- tions of production and class analysis. This paper seeks to critically explore the new develop- ments in Labor Process Theory within the recent thirty years and discuss their contributions and limitations.