经济评论
經濟評論
경제평론
Economic Review
2013年
3期
38~47
,共null页
消费不平等 出生组分解 回归方程分解 扩大内需
消費不平等 齣生組分解 迴歸方程分解 擴大內需
소비불평등 출생조분해 회귀방정분해 확대내수
Consumption Inequality; Birth Cohort Decomposition; Regression Equation Decomposition; Expand Domestic Demand
本文利用2000—2009年广东省城镇住户调查数据,详细度量了城镇家庭各种消费不平等的大小,采用出生组分解和回归分解方法,探讨了消费不平等和收入不平等、总消费不平等和服务消费不平等的形成机制。研究发现,2000—2009年,收入基尼系数维持在0.326~0.366之间,而消费基尼系数由0.320增长至0.384,2005年开始消费不平等高于收入不平等。除食物消费不平等外,文化娱乐、汽车和住房消费不平等显著大于总消费不平等和收入不平等。更年轻的出生组(1970年代和1980年代)存在更高的收入不平等和消费不平等。可支配收入对总消费差距和文化娱乐消费差距的贡献度均达到了40%以上。降低收入不平等、提高人力资本、发展服务业、完善消费刺激政策,对降低家庭消费不平等和扩大内需具有重要作用。
本文利用2000—2009年廣東省城鎮住戶調查數據,詳細度量瞭城鎮傢庭各種消費不平等的大小,採用齣生組分解和迴歸分解方法,探討瞭消費不平等和收入不平等、總消費不平等和服務消費不平等的形成機製。研究髮現,2000—2009年,收入基尼繫數維持在0.326~0.366之間,而消費基尼繫數由0.320增長至0.384,2005年開始消費不平等高于收入不平等。除食物消費不平等外,文化娛樂、汽車和住房消費不平等顯著大于總消費不平等和收入不平等。更年輕的齣生組(1970年代和1980年代)存在更高的收入不平等和消費不平等。可支配收入對總消費差距和文化娛樂消費差距的貢獻度均達到瞭40%以上。降低收入不平等、提高人力資本、髮展服務業、完善消費刺激政策,對降低傢庭消費不平等和擴大內需具有重要作用。
본문이용2000—2009년광동성성진주호조사수거,상세도량료성진가정각충소비불평등적대소,채용출생조분해화회귀분해방법,탐토료소비불평등화수입불평등、총소비불평등화복무소비불평등적형성궤제。연구발현,2000—2009년,수입기니계수유지재0.326~0.366지간,이소비기니계수유0.320증장지0.384,2005년개시소비불평등고우수입불평등。제식물소비불평등외,문화오악、기차화주방소비불평등현저대우총소비불평등화수입불평등。경년경적출생조(1970년대화1980년대)존재경고적수입불평등화소비불평등。가지배수입대총소비차거화문화오악소비차거적공헌도균체도료40%이상。강저수입불평등、제고인력자본、발전복무업、완선소비자격정책,대강저가정소비불평등화확대내수구유중요작용。
Using the data from 2000 -2009 Urban Household Survey in Guangdong Province,this paper measures different kinds of consumption inequality. Based on methods of birth cohort decomposition and regression decomposition, we compare the mechanism of consumption inequality with that of income inequality and entertainment consumption inequality respectively. The study finds that from 2000 to 2009,the Gini coefficient of income increases from 0. 326 to 0. 366, and the Gini coefficient of consumption increases from 0. 320 to 0.38g. The consumption inequality of entertainment, car and house is significantly greater than the total consumption inequality and income inequality. Younger birth cohorts( 1970s and 1980s) have greater income inequality and greater consumption inequality than older birth cohorts. The disposable income of urban household has more than 40% contribution to total consumption inequality and entertainment consumption inequality. Reducing income inequality, improving human capital, developing the services industry and improving stimulus policies on consumption play important roles on reducing household consumption inequality and expand domestic demand.