CAJ | 학술논문

《文心雕龙》文体论各篇论述了各类文体的写作问题，其中《史传》一篇专论史传文体的写作，评析了包括《史记》在内的历史上重要史传著作的得失优劣。在《史传》中，刘勰认同《史记》以孔子修《春秋》为楷模与范式的创作宗旨，肯定了司马迁富于辩证性与整体性的“变”与“通”的历史观，同时从经学立场出发对司马迁“反经爱奇”的思想倾向提出责难。刘勰对《史记》的评价，让我们了解到刘勰与司马迁在历史观念、史学思想上的异同。
《문심조룡》문체론각편논술료각류문체적사작문제，기중《사전》일편전론사전문체적사작，평석료포괄《사기》재내적역사상중요사전저작적득실우렬。재《사전》중，류협인동《사기》이공자수《춘추》위해모여범식적창작종지，긍정료사마천부우변증성여정체성적“변”여“통”적역사관，동시종경학립장출발대사마천“반경애기”적사상경향제출책난。류협대《사기》적평개，양아문료해도류협여사마천재역사관념、사학사상상적이동。
The chapters about Stylistic Theory in Wenxindiaolong discusses the writing of various genres, in which Historical Bi- ography comments on advantages and defects of biographic writing including Shiji. Liu Xie agrees with the creative purpose of Shiji to set the Confucius Spring and Autumn as a model paradigm, affirms the view of history of Sima Qian that abound with dialectics and in- tegrity, blames the anti -classics and odd ideological tendency of Sima Qian by the the Confucius stance. Interpretation ofLiu Xieg Shiji evaluation, we can have in - depth understanding of the similarities and differences of Liu Xie and Sima Qian in the history ide- as, historical thought , as well as the internal causes of their differences.