经济社会体制比较
經濟社會體製比較
경제사회체제비교
Comparative Economic and Social Systems
2013年
3期
1~11
,共null页
社会主义基本经济制度 微观经济基础 政企分开 公有制主体 经营性国企
社會主義基本經濟製度 微觀經濟基礎 政企分開 公有製主體 經營性國企
사회주의기본경제제도 미관경제기출 정기분개 공유제주체 경영성국기
Basic Socialist Economic System; Microeconomie Foundation; Public Ownership Main Part; For - Profit State- Owned Enterprise
中国特色社会主义道路，就经济制度讲，其基本“特色”就是社会主义基本经济制度跟市场经济相“结合”，其核心本质是公有制与市场经济相“结合”。这种社会主义市场经济，是旷古未有、旷世未见的制度创新。中国在改革探索中找到了这个“结合点”和“结合”方法，即国企改革，关键是“产权明晰、责权明确、政企分开、管理科学”，把国企改革成市场经济不可或缺的“微观经济基础”。“政企分开”的要点，是把作为政治实体的国家（各级政府）跟作为经济实体的国家在体制上分开，政府只供给公共产品和公共服务，不从事经营性国企的经营；要重塑“国资委”，负责统辖经营性国企，同时成立国家资源委员会，二者受“人大”委托作为国有经营性资产和资源的体制载体，实现公有制跟市场经济的“结合”。
中國特色社會主義道路，就經濟製度講，其基本“特色”就是社會主義基本經濟製度跟市場經濟相“結閤”，其覈心本質是公有製與市場經濟相“結閤”。這種社會主義市場經濟，是曠古未有、曠世未見的製度創新。中國在改革探索中找到瞭這箇“結閤點”和“結閤”方法，即國企改革，關鍵是“產權明晰、責權明確、政企分開、管理科學”，把國企改革成市場經濟不可或缺的“微觀經濟基礎”。“政企分開”的要點，是把作為政治實體的國傢（各級政府）跟作為經濟實體的國傢在體製上分開，政府隻供給公共產品和公共服務，不從事經營性國企的經營；要重塑“國資委”，負責統轄經營性國企，同時成立國傢資源委員會，二者受“人大”委託作為國有經營性資產和資源的體製載體，實現公有製跟市場經濟的“結閤”。
중국특색사회주의도로，취경제제도강，기기본“특색”취시사회주의기본경제제도근시장경제상“결합”，기핵심본질시공유제여시장경제상“결합”。저충사회주의시장경제，시광고미유、광세미견적제도창신。중국재개혁탐색중조도료저개“결합점”화“결합”방법，즉국기개혁，관건시“산권명석、책권명학、정기분개、관이과학”，파국기개혁성시장경제불가혹결적“미관경제기출”。“정기분개”적요점，시파작위정치실체적국가（각급정부）근작위경제실체적국가재체제상분개，정부지공급공공산품화공공복무，불종사경영성국기적경영；요중소“국자위”，부책통할경영성국기，동시성입국가자원위원회，이자수“인대”위탁작위국유경영성자산화자원적체제재체，실현공유제근시장경제적“결합”。
In terms of economic system, the path of socialism with Chinese characteristics means China＇s basic socialist economic system is combined with a market economy. Its main characteristic could be defined as the combination of public ownership with market economy. Such a socialistic market economy has never been seen before, or in the world now. In the process of exploration, China has discovered the point of integration and the way to integrate public ownership and a market economy, namely, by reforming state - owned enterprises on the basis of ＂clear established ownership, well defined power and responsibility, separation of enterprises from ad- ministration, and scientific management,＂ in order to turn SOEs into the micro - economic foundation indispen- sable to the market economy. The essential content of ＂separation of enterprise from administration＂ is to sepa- rate the state as a political entity （governments at all levels） from the state as a public economic entity within the socialist system. The functions of government at all levels are only limited to providing public goods and public services ; they are never allowed to engage in any operation of or profit from SOEs. The State Assets Ad- ministration Commission must be re - shaped, and National Resources Administration Commission must be built - up. Both are entrusted by people congresses （ at all levels） to assume the institutional responsibilities of the owner of state assets and national resources, so as to achieve the combination of public system with market e-conomy.
