CAJ | 학술논문

对《现代足球竞赛规则演变及尽快修改的必要性和思路》中提出的问题与作者商榷,对该文将＂现行裁判规则违背公平竞赛的原则＂与＂裁判规则在判罚中存在的争议焦点＂作为规则修改必要性的立论基点,以及引入＂鹰眼＂、＂净时间＂、＂双裁判＂等的思路提出质疑。通过对规则本质特征和演变机制的梳理,认为规则修改不能以科技取代人,不能忽视足球＂基因＂,应遵循规则理念,彰显足球＂个性＂,并对规则修改的未来趋势提出建议。
대《현대족구경새규칙연변급진쾌수개적필요성화사로》중제출적문제여작자상각,대해문장＂현행재판규칙위배공평경새적원칙＂여＂재판규칙재판벌중존재적쟁의초점＂작위규칙수개필요성적립론기점,이급인입＂응안＂、＂정시간＂、＂쌍재판＂등적사로제출질의。통과대규칙본질특정화연변궤제적소리,인위규칙수개불능이과기취대인,불능홀시족구＂기인＂,응준순규칙이념,창현족구＂개성＂,병대규칙수개적미래추세제출건의。
The authors discussed with the author about issues raised in The evolution of modern football competition rules as well as the necessity of and ideas for their revision as soon as possible,questioned the author’s ideas to use ＂existing referee rules violated the principle of fair competition＂ and ＂referee rules were controversial in penalty＂ as the fundamental grounds for arguing the necessity of rule revision as well as to introduce ＂eagle eye＂,＂net time＂ and ＂twin referee＂ etc.By analyzing the substantive characteristics of the rules and their evolution mechanism,the authors put forward the following opinions：＂science＂ should not replace ＂human＂ in rule revision;football ＂genes＂ should not be ignored;rule conceptions should be followed;football ＂personalities＂ should be highlighted,and made suggestions for the future trend of rule revision.