CAJ | 학술논문

本文发现，绝大多数关于运动事件的研究存在研究范围和方法论的不当，具体为：（1）研究过度集中在对物理性位移运动事件的研究。误以为Talmy的理论是在对物理性位移运动事件研究中提出来的。因此，验证该理论仅需要在该类事件中进行。（2）研究缺乏统一的科学方法论。误以为Talmy的理论在方法论上是开放的。本文指出：（1）物理性位移运动事件仅仅是运动事件的两大组成部分之一。（2）运动事件仅仅是宏事件的五个组成部分之一；目前少有研究涉及物理性位移运动事件之外的内容。（3）Talmy对宏事件的研究遵循严格的方法论，即语料的“口语化、高频率、普遍性”。
본문발현，절대다수관우운동사건적연구존재연구범위화방법론적불당，구체위：（1）연구과도집중재대물이성위이운동사건적연구。오이위Talmy적이론시재대물이성위이운동사건연구중제출래적。인차，험증해이론부수요재해류사건중진행。（2）연구결핍통일적과학방법론。오이위Talmy적이론재방법론상시개방적。본문지출：（1）물이성위이운동사건부부시운동사건적량대조성부분지일。（2）운동사건부부시굉사건적오개조성부분지일；목전소유연구섭급물이성위이운동사건지외적내용。（3）Talmy대굉사건적연구준순엄격적방법론，즉어료적“구어화、고빈솔、보편성”。
This article argues that there generally exist two types of errors in macro-event research concerning research scope and methodology as follows： First, Talmy had based his dichotomy of verb-framed and satellite-framed languages solely on motion events, with the result that tests of his framework have been limited to treating motion events only; Second, Talmy had used a permissive methodology open to any form of data. This article concludes that： First, Talmy based his dichotomy not on the motion event but on the ＂macro-event＂, which-includes five different types of event （a motion event is only one of these）. Moreover, motion events for Talmy cover an extensive range of variations, but the research of others has addressed only a small subset of these. Second, Talmy has strict methodological requirements on this type of research concerning colloquial in style, frequency in use and pervasiveness. This article discusses these issues and proposes a solution to ascertain the typological status of a language.